Save Private Scholz.

The composition of the new (to hear the gossip) Scholz government must have been really worrying, if in Italy the first defenders are already up. I read the opinions of an idiot, whom I do not mention because I fear his stupidity is toxic even in the name, who has started looking for the usual "systemic enemy" to hide the fact that his "traffic light" government has already catastrophically failed at the first test.

The systemic enemy is the kind of enemy, or scapegoat, that is used on the left to hide one's problems. “The system”, “the market”, “the mentality”, etc. Here, the German idiot informs us today that the fault of the out-of-control fourth wave is not in the fact that in parliament there is FDP that opposes any restriction, lockdown, green pass, mandatory vaccination campaign.

Ninth. We discover that the fault lies with "semi-private health". I could simply object by saying that all the larger krankenkasses are co-owned by the state, so I don't understand what is "private", but the problem is that with the previous government the first, second and third wave were managed quite admirably. Only the fourth (which arrives first in the north because winter comes first) seems to be a tough nut to crack, and it is because the new "traffic light" majority is unable to make a decision.

Certainly, measures have been taken: but not at the federal level. Since Merkel cannot make decisions because she is in the administrative government, and Scholz does NOT have a majority in parliament, (FDP said she was against EVERYTHING), she had to beg the BundesLänder to take action. And do you know from what budget the compulsory tampons in schools are being paid? From that of the BundesLänder, certainly not from that of the federal Gesundheitamt, or from the federal one. Because'? Because in parliament Scholz does NOT have a majority capable of voting on a budget increase: FDP would say no, and they just took over the finance minister. (you will soon regret Schäuble: all of Europe will regret it).

I repeat: the new "majority" of parliament cannot do without FDP, a turbo-liberal party of fanatics, and FDP is against anything to do against Covid. But not only that: its representatives have made it clear that they do not believe that vaccination, lockdown, 3G, 2G or other measures are effective. According to them "it is not scientifically proven". (they did their research on the internet …)

So today the German press, (and also the Italian one, I see, which hosts articles of the usual stupid German) does nothing but shout that the fault lies with "private health". First of all, it exists only on paper, just as there are no “private banks” or “private railways” (the state is everywhere), but it has managed the first three waves admirably. Did it "privatize" immediately after the elections?

But the stupidity of this vulgate is that it is, in fact, "private" health. Whoever speaks in this way is suggesting the idea that the Scholz government will go and get its hands on us to restore more public health: and with what devil majority would they do it, given that FDP sees red at the mere hearing of “public? ".

How do you think you can re-nationalize healthcare with a party that has so far said NO even to pay for tests from the federal budget, because it thinks the Mercato Vede et Provvede?

Do they really think they can do something AGAINST PRIVATE healthcare with a coalition that includes FDP, which instead would like to privatize it even more?

This is the stupidity I'm talking about: creating a scapegoat that is also in YOUR OWN government program. The leader of FDP, a staunch marketer, fanatic of schwartze-null (the budget in order at any cost), a staunch opponent of whatever is welfare or state, has been proposed as finance minister.

And they would like to ask him for the money to re-nationalize the health system? Does the stupid man who writes for Corriere realize that if I asked him tomorrow to nationalize the health system to 100%, the "traffic light" government of his Scholz would jump, abandoned by FDP? Do you realize that your pathetic excuse is putting your government in even worse shape?

Minister Spahn said, with his usual German brutality, that at this rate by the end of winter the Germans would be vaccinated, cured or dead. He was accused of brutality, but at the end of the day, that's what the numbers say.

Let me be clear: for me, vaccinated twice with an appointment for the third dose (the older ones come first), the fact that the most stupid component of the population leaves their skin is good news for the homo-sapiens species.

The fact that they have transformed schools into bacteriological bombs, leaving to the usual debate "I did my own research" the task of deciding whether to vaccinate children for me is positive news: it means that the virus will take them right into theirs. houses, and that will keep the idiots from reproducing again.

But I'm cynical, even more cynical than Spahn. I am glad that my daughter, vaccinated, can go to school and not even wear a mask to class, so that those fools who have not been vaccinated will find the virus directly at dinner, when they are all sitting around the same table for dinner. .

But when it comes the one who, after seeing FDP saying no to ANY measure, forcing the future chancellor to beg the BundesLänder to do something with their budget and their powers, complains of a private health that DOES NOT REALLY EXIST, to me honestly it makes me laugh. We REALLY want to talk about the "privatizations" done in Germany, pretending that the state, the Bundesländer, the Sparkasse connected to the Hanseatic cities, the cities themselves, which own the majority of EVERYTHING that is "privatized", are really "private. "? What fucking private health care are we talking about?

If things start like this, it doesn't take long to understand what will happen to the Scholz government: at the first economic decision, the government will certainly not be able to ask the BundesLänder for help, and therefore will only have the choice to obey the FDP diktat. , or to agree with CDU to make a constructive distrust.

As long as the epidemic doesn't go so badly as to have to do it first.

But the fault of a coalition that is both ideological and ideologically unstable, of course, will be "private health", "cynical and cheating destiny", "tragedy of loneliness", or who knows what other entity will be call to justify failure.

I propose, for my part, to blame the Hubble cosmological constant.

At least it has a cool name, and it really exists.