The Honest DOCGs
The story of the corruption of the leaders of the European socialists is a surprise only for those who have never focused their eyes on the phenomenon of lobbies (the lobbyists also have membership cards for the Italian parliament) and the fact that, as is obvious, "lobbies" is to "corruption" as "escort" is to "prostitute".
It is clear that if we take a term in Italian and bring it into English, it becomes "fico", or if you prefer "fashionable". If you take a slut and call her an "escort", sucking the cock of a passing Bulgarian truck driver becomes almost "fashion", and never mind if the guy has a difficult relationship with the shower. Then maybe someone will say no, the escort works higher up, but don't worry: if she's really proletarian, the whore becomes a "sex worker", and the red flag will triumph.
The same goes for “lobbies”.
Lobby is the English term born to indicate the corruption of politicians.
Obviously the word "lobby" hides the ugly part, just as "escort" hides "prostitute" and "sex worker" is simply "cheap prostitute". But when we talk about lobbying we talk about corruption, and no newspaper can tell the simple truth:
the corruption of politicians is a systematic and organized phenomenon because the lobbying activity is systematic and organised. Or rather, these are two absolutely equivalent statements.
After all, if we look at the expense that the various industries make in "lobbying", we immediately discover that something is not right.
The lobby of the American IT industry alone spends nine billion euros every year in Brussels. Now, nine billion euros out of a parliament of 700 people means almost 13 million euros per MP.
How is this money spent?
The first entry is the so-called “think tanks”. the "Think Tank" is the one that if you say to ban chlorine in chicken because it's toxic, he'll give you a conference where he explains that chlorine in chicken rejuvenates your skin and makes you prick up.
So the "Think Tanks" hold conferences, in Brussels, on everything. Politicians from the EU are always invited, whether they are inside or outside the parliament (often the conferences take place inside if they are sponsored by a parliamentarian or a group) and their purpose is to explain to the parliamentarian what he is talking about:
- if you put more taxes on the rich, Satan sends the BBFH ( Batwinged Bimbos From Hell) to earth, to which the Vatican will answer with its Sisters of Our Lady of Harley-Davidson, and in the titanic clash you will probably be beaten with a rubber duck.
- if you tell Apple that it has to use USB-C and not fuck up with its incompatibilities, then the Visitors are coming who eat all the pantegane alive and then your sister too and bring the 80s backcombed hair back into fashion.
etc.
Not only politicians are invited to these conferences, but also insiders: the more people there are, the more convinced the politician is. Personally, I've only seen one, where they explained to us that the possibility of changing telcos instantly using eSIMs was a victory for Islamic terrorism.
Is this enough to explain how the Lobby activity works? No. Nine billion euros can't even be explained by conferences and think tanks. And even with dinner invitations (how much the fuck is a dinner in Brussels?).
And we're only talking about the US IT lobby. So that's nine billion euros every year, plus…. more money. And money. And money to screw around.
So?
So it stands to reason that if we accept lobbying and give lobbyists access to parliaments (as is the case throughout the West except in Sweden, where lobbying is a bribery crime), we KNOW that we will find corruption.
And even those who say "let's regulate the activity of the lobbies" are in practice proposing to give a cloak of regularity to something that is scandalously corrupt.
But the following problem is: why the PSE?
To answer this question, let's imagine that you are, I don't know, allergic to lactose. Then you will go and buy lactose-free food. And you will look for the sticker, convinced that if it says "lactose-free" then it is normal and obvious that someone has checked.
This thing happens in many sectors: "Anglo-Saxon journalism" was the absolute best, but who controlled them? Who said it? It was "tradition", they said to ennoble what was simply a reputation. And so people went to the US or the UK to "study journalism" because that was, traditionally, the best journalism.
If only we exclude that Fox News is spreading the protocol of the Elders of Zion and that Tucker is making an apology for genocide. And that the British were overwhelmed by such a wave of lies that Brexit took place.
Similarly, the Anglo-Saxon political world said it was absolutely extraneous to populist phenomena such as Silvio Berlusconi. To then have Trump, Boris Johnson, Brexit. So, they said they were immune: but who had checked?
So, the left of the PSE has given itself a nickname, which is that of being "the honest ones". Has anyone checked? No. But that's what they say.
The result is that if I wanted to bribe someone to hide human rights violations, I would choose people from the PSE, or from the PD in Italy:
- they have the name of being very sensitive to human rights. If they say that everything is fine in Qatar, many believe it.
- they have a reputation for being honest, so typically no one will catch me.
This thing happens with everything, from superfine quality DOCG food even when it sucks (but who checks?), to coffee in Naples or tortellini in Modena. Then you go there and discover that a lady from Burkina Faso made them. And they taste like Rhinoceros. But they are DOCG.
These cones of shadow made up of irreproachable reputations are the real problem, because in these cones of shadow everything takes refuge, from the family of Aboubakar Soumahoro who was among the good ones by definition "as a black and trade unionist", up to the NGOs of the seas which obviously have nothing to do with some political parties in northern Europe.
Is there a solution to all of this? Stop believing clichés could be one, but also ask yourself "but who says that coffee in Naples is the best? We are sure?"
Sure, this may seem obscene to some, but if you continue to take advantage of the reputation of things that were good in the past, you risk causing a whorehouse.
On all of this the news is muffled, for a simple reason: inside the news there is a fact that could make people think, and put strange thoughts in the citizens' heads. So the news must disappear at any cost.
The news is that in the European Parliament there is no impunity if you are caught red-handed. It is one of the many things abroad that are not made known in Italy (here, in the event of a strike, the union pays a large part of the working day, so to speak) to prevent anyone from forming strange ideas.
And propose to do the same things in Italy.