I know, when you are abroad you like to read the press of your former country. Partly because you like to see that you were right to leave. And just a little more to be to know what you are talking about when a careless German asks you about what he has read in his favorite press.
The post-election period is characterized by what I define “because Italian politics is what it is”, that is, a press that cannot obtain anything else.
First of all, articles such as "where Meloni wants to bring Italy" or "Who is the real iorgia meloni", or even more boring "here is Giorgia Meloni's program".
Now, I understand that the average journalist lives in the typical semicomatous state of the ass licker: while you lick your ass you do not breathe, and this very serious lack of oxygen does a lot of damage. Clarified.
But Giorgia Meloni has been in politics for a very long time. By now at Bouvette they call her you. What the fuck is it that we don't know about her? Blood tests? Last visit to the gynecologist?
The day after the election, the papers tell you what his program will be. There are two cases: either the Italians had no idea BEFORE they voted, or it is useless.
This is the “useless” part of the post-election. Over time I became convinced that it is like birthday parties, that the leftovers are eaten the next day: and then the press publishes the article that was in the fridge, with the leftovers of the Meloni or "Chi e 'Giorgia" program , written in 1997, and then remained there, behind the aubergines and the tray with the baby snacks. That it keeps for a long time.
Another nerve-wracking process is the "analysis of defeat". On the right is a quick, painless process, which aims to compact the party around the leader after the blow. They do it quickly "sbroc sbroc lobby gay, sbroc sbroc boderi fordi, sbroc sbroc Soros, sbroc sbroc radicalchic" . Once this is done, the whole party stands with the leader who will guide them to the great return. And now to work.
It does not last long, it is simple, it allows the party to correct itself.
On the left, it's a real psychodrama.
The Italian left's self-criticism process has some characteristics:
- It hasn't worked since 1919. It has never worked. He never dug spider out of the hole.
- It's as painful as a BDSM session, but there's not the fun part.
- It's Freudian, but much more embarrassing. We do not know where this is headed.
It is an absolutely embarrassing process. We would expect to hear that as children they saw their parents fuck, or that they have erectile tissues in their noses, and other Freudian bullshit. But no. On the left it always turns out that it's all the secretary's fault. He did everything while the others were at the seaside.
And of course he lost: he was alone doing everything while the others were at the beach.
The process of self-criticism, or analysis of defeat, always concludes that it does nothing, and that we must change but remain faithful to "values".
The women of the PD. Since the PD consumes secretaries, obviously there is always the possibility that the next one is a woman. Now, I would have nothing against it per se, but if we look at the women of the PD, we find that they are almost always useless idiots.
And it is not only valid in Italy. If I search the European left, I don't find women who will go down in political history. If I look for women who will go down in history, I find Thatcher, I find Merkel, I find Von der Leyen. All women who come out of conservative parties: they don't have many women, but the ones who have rock.
Segolene Royale, today, is "ambassador for the Arctic and Antarctic" by appointment of Macron: on the left, women are selected at the entrance, in a very simple way. To join the PD and make a political career:
- wives and lovers of small local officials
- stupid people who won't bother local officials
- GLBT, immigrants but only if chic, petulant, annoying, divorced from dreality
obviously, the result is that when we go to observe the women of the PD we suspect one thing.
The day will come when "PD woman" will be a full blown insult. Because now "woman of the PD" is synonymous with a happy goose, a useless politician, a miserable idiot.
I know you will now accuse me of "insulting ALL women". Because you can't read. I only insulted career women in the PD. And no, they do not "represent" all women, because if the political women of the PD represented ALL women, their party would have 50% more votes than men.
Instead, the latest policies show that at best the PD represents only 18% of Italian women. The rest, fortunately, are not "women of the PD".
It is no wonder that no "PD woman" is politically relevant, or if no one has access to leadership: they were selected so that if someone had the mental or temperamental skills to do so, they would be expelled from the party very much. before you can get to the top.
I know you think I'm exaggerating: I hope Elly Schlein becomes more popular and goes on television more often. You will change your mind. It's just stupid.
Another embarrassing thing are the editorials of the editors, and of the chronic columnists like Michele Serra.
It is not clear what they mean, where they want to end up, but first of all WHY THEY NEVER WRITE AND PUBLISH THEM. Whether it's Giannini, Serra, or Molinari, or Conchita de Gregorio: why are you writing? What is the purpose of what you write? And especially: WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU WRITING? What are the conclusions? How does it end? And then? What does it mean? Nothing.
It is the most boring phenomenon, if we want, because you find yourself reading absurd things, such as that one party must start from the heart, the other that must renew itself but keeping the important people, and all this caciara only serves to nourish that one. psychodrama that characterizes the center-left parties when they decide to renew themselves without innovating.
Reactions from Europe / Stock Exchange / Press.
Now, if I proposed you a newspaper from Utzbekistan, and I told you that in the end it says that Meloni is okay, what would I have told you? You don't know. Maybe it's a Nazi newspaper. Maybe it's a veteran newspaper. And things would change, depending on.
But now I ask you: what do you know about Le Figaro? What do you know about Welt? What do you know about Bild? What do you know about El Mundo? Am I right? Of left? Which?
And if you don't know the editorial line anyway, if you can't understand the difference between Bild and Faz, what do you need to know what he wrote?
The latest boring trend in the Italian press is the effect of the government BEFORE the government takes office. I discover today, via fediverso, that a social center is being cleared out because, obviously, now Meloni is in charge. As if the social centers have not been cleared in the past, and never by leftist juntas. Which is not true, see Bologna.
But it is said that they are making her happy in advance. Okay, but he knew he would have won for months. Why today? Yesterday would have been fine too.
Okay, now we know that Meloni has the thaumaturgical ability to be in government and cause effects BEFORE the president calls her.
Finally, one last thing about abortion. The right to abortion in Italy has no longer existed for a good twenty years. Because the lords of CL (Communion and Liberation) have occupied the hospitals with their objectors and no longer find adequate doctors.
Your "left" leaders go to the CL meeting on time.
Who do you want to take the piss, precisely, when you say that now Meloni will question the right to abortion, which you haven't had for at least 20 years?
