#allabuonora #rudeawakening

I wrote a few days ago that there is some geopolitical agenda in the history of vaccine distribution crises. The pinafore journalists of Italy, of course, preferred for a few days the logic "Blame the EU" or "Blame Germany" (inventing millions of phantom doses that would have been delivered by Pfizer, depending on the buttock licker are 4 or 30 million), but now the truth is coming out.

Let's talk about Pfizer first.

First of all, it is absolutely clear that THERE ARE NO delays in deliveries to USA, Canada, UK, New Zealand and Australia, ie the famous 5 eyes, or if you prefer the anglosphere “at its best”.

Pfizer's situation seems to have been unlocked when Angela Merkel made it known (and could not have made it known: she is not required to report the contents of the phone calls she makes to Putin) that she is interested in the Sputnik vaccine. And if that wasn't enough, Orban has decided to vaccinate its citizens using the Chinese vaccine: the threat is implicit. If vaccination works there, then it will be difficult for the EU to turn down "generous" vaccine offers from China.

AstraZeneca's situation is different. Different because it is an English company, and therefore it is expected to be flat on the support of the British government, whose mantra is "Yes, Brexit is a terrible anal fuck but look at how we do well with vaccines without EU" . So it is obvious that the British government has made all the pressures / promises of the case to make this a reality.

This front will also crumble, because in any case the Pfizer vaccine is, for the most part, produced in the EU, and the commission has already threatened to block exports even though Pfizer is American.

But back to Pfizer. Why is Pfizer following a policy hostile to the EU, which seems to have been designed to divide? The answer is simple: Biden, like Clinton, is not pro-European. Like Clinton, she detests and despises the EU, and like Clinton she would not have (and will not have) any problem in starting a war in Europe under the guise of Ukraine, precisely in order to destroy the EU. If you drop a nuclear on your head, you know who wanted it.

This hostility is very visible: just look at the first phone call from President Biden to Macron. It is true that Merkel is outgoing, but first of all her probable successors are her clones (except Merz), and by now the imprint she has given to the CDU is too strong to speak of “the end of the Merkel era”. By now his party is populated by clones and by now his politics (like the use / abuse of a gigantic data center to have the data to make decisions) has become a standard.

Moreover, even Macron is not long-lived: he was elected in 2017, and with a five-year term in office, he expires in 2022. But he will not leave a great legacy, and he has no clones.

So don't say that Macron received Biden's call first because "Merkel's mandate ends". Macron's also ends a few months later. It's not the 4-year president who's going to accompany Biden.

The point is simple:

today the enemy of Europe, and of all the states that are part of it, is called USA.

And he's a ferocious enemy, who doesn't mind running out of vaccines during a pandemic, killing hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of people.

I repeat: the enemy is the USA

This is the simple statement that apron journalists don't want to write. That if we take the 5 Anglo-Saxon cousins ​​(USA, UK, Canada, New Zealand, Australia), the two older ones are hostile, and the others are distant, but culturally adverse. (Public opinion has supported Brexit in a shameless and chauvinistic way as much as the English one). And it is precisely the five that vaccines are NOT lacking.

Now, as it happened when the story started, it's not that people will become aware of it because I write it here. Just as today you are not aware that there are national clashes because I wrote it: you are aware of it because, as usual, the reality in times of pandemic is much faster to emerge.

It is constantly said that the pandemic has accelerated processes already underway, but this implies one thing: that historical processes are moving faster.

Consequently, soon this clash will be evident, and it will be very clear that the US has not at all abandoned "America first", because it is not an invention of Trump, but a consequence of American exceptionalism, which is 'bipartisan. (Exceptionalism is the name that Nazism takes in Anglo-Saxon countries: a myth of superiority and the end of history).

And it will be clear that Biden is not "the opposite of Trump", as the Italian press has told us, but an expression of the company that still voted for Trump with 70 million preferences. Biden cannot differ much from Trump, because the difference in the number of votes is too low.

But the point remains that: soon, very soon, European countries will have to make a choice: Atlantic or Eurasia. And it is a choice that requires a renunciation.

This vaccine fight is only a clear omen: the Atlantic has become huge. The Anglo-Saxon world is screwing into its isolation, and soon the rags will fly. Macron himself won't last long when the US tells him to stop selling his planes to the Greeks, because their military industry wants to sell him F-35s.

But the problem arises in an even more tragic way, if we think of one thing: “pacta sunt servanda”.

European countries will have to choose between two things:

• a short-term ally, whose next president will tear any deal the first week in office. An ally that asks to go to war against Russia and China together.
• look to the east, and be able to write long-term (economic and political) strategies, in a continental block that hosts 70% of the human population, Eurasia).

Obviously, those who are still stuck in the 80s this thing does not go down. Because when someone talks or talks about "atlantism" they are referring to this: this politician comes from the 1980s.

But we are in 2020. Those who are under 40 do not have the faintest idea why we have to syrup the US morning, noon and evening. It wasn't there when the Wall fell. It wasn't there in the 90s.

So these journalist-made aprons will do anything to hide the fact that, as Europeans, we have an enemy.

What will the countries choose? The countries of the East will choose the Russians and the Chinese, because they do not put stakes on human rights.
Germany has always looked to the East, it is a constant in its history. In the German history books there are resources in the east, problems in the west.
The Italians will follow who can save them from an impending economic disaster.
The French will never join an alliance that has England as its foot in Europe.

The story, that is, is already written.

It will happen before our eyes, but thanks to a leccacaculo press, in some countries nobody will notice anything.