What’s happening in England?
I saw the stories of the English riots, but I also saw so much propaganda about it (both from Radio Netanhyahu – as I call the Italian press, and from the rest of the media) that in the end I decided to rigidly apply the antiquated filter to try to arrive at a reasonable description of what happened.
Let's start from the beginning. A guy – who I know nothing about – enters a place where they do Yoga, and kills three little girls.
Why do I say I know NOTHING about this guy? Because all the bodies that have tried to give it an identity have proven to be organs of propaganda, including the English government and its institutions. In these conditions, from my point of view I KNOW NOTHING about the culprit, except that he stabbed and killed three little girls.
This was the spark, that t0 after which the events take place, and without which presumably the events would not have taken place.
Phase two follows: propaganda arrives.
The government bodies say that the culprit is an English guy born in England. But they don't say anything else. Since no one is a monkey, everyone notices one thing: Excusatio non petita, accusatio manifest . What need is there to list, first of all and without request, that the guy is English and born in England? And then, secondly: do they believe that people are stupid, and that they don't know that Islamic immigrants also have children in England?
At that precise moment the English government and the "official" mass media lost all credibility. On the one hand, the population KNOWS that the government wants to hide something , and on the other, a tremendous DEMAND for information is created. Who is this monster?
The perfect breeding ground for MORE fake news. Some of which speak of a refugee who arrived there with an illegal boat, who is called something like “Mohammed ISIS Al Qaeda Döner Kalashnikov al Sgozzam”. And of course he's known for being such a terrorist that instead of a caesarean section his mother used an explosive belt.
I know, it's hard to digest, but Döner is a more common surname than you think.
However, now there are TWO sources, neither reliable, which the population can believe or not. So far, it's about the stupidity of the mass media world, both official and alternative.
To counter these allegations, the brilliant English government makes it known that he is a boy of African origin, with an African name, born in England. And so far it would be fine. You can always say that English law prevents giving identity before trial. There is.
But since the English are what they are, they have to add the useless bullshit that gets you into trouble . They add that the family is Christian, and the same goes for the murderer. And that terrorism has nothing to do with it.
I don't want to shoot at the Red Cross, but "he's a Christian" and "he stabs three little girls to death" tend not to coincide. I don't have much sympathy for Christianity, but it must be admitted that the two have not become synonymous over time. If you say he's not Muslim, pass. But if you say he's Christian, I form in my mind the image of an altar boy who goes around slaughtering innocent little girls. It does not work.
“It has nothing to do with terrorism” is the stupidest thing that could have been said. One, because it is obvious that such an act falls within the definition of terrorism. You can call it internal terrorism, or domestic as the Anglo-Saxons say (who have evidently domesticated terrorists, perhaps as pets?).
Saying that an action whose only effect is that of the police asking the population to stay indoors is NOT terrorism means that not only do you want to take the piss out of the population, but you have also entered into a contest to take the piss out of it improve. If it smells like terrorism, produces widespread terror, smells like terrorism and looks like terrorism, IT IS TERRORISM, period. Do damage control and place an adjective, such as domestic or internal terrorism or quantum terrorism. “Quantum terrorism”. Damn, that sounds good. But saying “it's not terrorism” is exactly the wrong thing.
Here ends the second phase, when there is fake news everywhere, and the police do everything possible to lose face and the trust of citizens.
the second phase of the story is where the state, the police and official sources lose face, causing a tremendous demand for fake news, immediately satisfied by the inevitable supply.
Let's face it: in comparison, Gasparri makes us look like a genius.
Phase three: shit hits the fan.
First of all: why do people believe fake news?
We said that the population seeks the truth knowing that they will be fooled by the government, but this does not mean believing anything. They obviously believe one thing, which was artfully constructed to exploit Confirmation Bias.
The story of "Mohammed ISIS Al Qaeda Döner Kalashnikov al Sgozzam", who arrived in the UK illegally on a boat fueled by rape, may work, but not by chance .
That's why I call it Confirmation Bias. Let's be clear, there's a lot of BIAS (zoom in on the image below to INSTRUCTE yourself)
but I was saying, in this case whoever created the story of "Mohammed ISIS Al Qaeda Döner Kalashnikov al Sgozzam", who arrived in the UK illegally on a boat fueled by rape, worked on confirmation bias.
- The population already thinks that stabbing children is associated with Muslims.
- The population already thinks that Muslims stab the English.
- The population already thinks that illegal immigrants stab the English.
This is the confirmation bias on which fake news is based. Why do the population think these things? Because in the less wealthy neighborhoods, where the white people live, those who read the newspapers read this. And the newspapers don't invent anything:
This confirmation bias is the means by which the fire spreads. But who exactly sets it? The government says that there are few fascists, but the government has already discredited itself and I don't believe it. Fake news says they are exasperated citizens. But the fake news was about Mohammed, and I don't believe that either.
Clashes and devastation are happening. After all, if I asked you who starts looting when BLM moves, what would you say?
all we know for sure is that the anger is being vented on shopkeepers. After all, if there is a way to make a street revolt inviting, and promise freedom to loot.
This triggers a prime minister who is embarrassing to say the least. Who is on holiday, and suddenly provides a remote biblical curse: "you will regret it bitterly". The trouble is that he also says "you forced me to come back from vacation". First of all, we don't understand what he's angry about, the revolt or the holidays?
And the question is serious, because the government has an interior minister. So all you had to do was pick up the phone, call the Interior Minister and say "send five battalions of policemen and wipe out that pile of idiots", and give an interview saying "our new prime minister can sort this out with one arm tied to his back. He is an expert in Shibari ”.
But no. So first he effectively erases the prime minister's reputation by returning to his homeland to manage the matter, but he does it in an absurd way, promising terrible revenge. And here another BIAS is discounted, namely that people are now comparing what you said today with what you said when someone killed the girls. If I'm protesting for X, you didn't bat an eyelid when X happened but you get pissed off when I protest, you give the impression of having accepted
In my opinion, how to say, that guy is overrated.
But as if that wasn't enough, you get caught up in your Chamberlain's Moment and come out saying "it's all the fault of a handful of fascists". Um. Interesting. But you're an idiot. The phenomenon is much more complex than usual, and also due to YOUR government and its absurd way of communicating.
Because it doesn't make sense: you know very well that they are protesting also because, in short, the phenomenon of knives in the street sticking into victims who happen to be white and who were previously in the hands of people who were Muslim due to bad luck, so you could also find a way to make a speech that satisfies both sides, at least the moderates, and thus isolate the extremists.
But no. Because in the meantime he arrives, Elon Amadeus X-4567 Barcode Dumbidiot Musk. Who takes to Twitter and says a civil war is about to start. Reassuring message. At this point the Prime Minister has a chance to show who he is, but instead he decides to show the population a second time what happens if you forget your balls inside the Babysitter and she doesn't give them back to you.
The minister decides, that is, not to take advantage of the situation and not to order the blocking, at least temporarily, of Twitter. For reasons of public order.
I can tell you with almost absolute certainty that this British Prime Minister is an overrated idiot, like Elon Amadeus X-4567 Barcode Dumbidiot Musk. They say there are always two assholes.
There are therefore three problems:
- Three little girls were killed by an unidentified individual.
- The government communicating drug-style.
- An idiot prime minister.
The rest is pure consequence. For example, you will ask me about the fascists and right-wing movements who are allegedly organizing the riots. But let's face it: where do I learn about these? Exclusively from government media, who have lost credibility by trying to hide or mislead. The fascist hypothesis is rejected for me. Ditto for the hypothesis that it would be the people who rise up: this comes from the same media that talk about civil war, and are discredited. So, I DON'T KNOW who is in those crowds: since they are looting shops, let's say thieves. But I wouldn't go any further.
Uriel Fanelli
The blog is visible from Fediverso by following:
Contacts:
- Fediverse: @ uriel@fedi.keinpfusch.net
- MATRIX: @uriel:mtrx.keinpfusch.net
- GNU JAMI: Ufanelli