Ah, the Porn. Forge of heroes!
For some time now I have been seeing a whole series of alarmed arrows around the internet that young people are watching porn, and that they shouldn't, and so on. Also, yesterday I talked about it, and I measured the reactions a little bit. But in general, what do I think about porn?
The first point is that pornography has been around for millennia, and it existed in many forms before today. So if we talk about modern western pornography as we find it on the internet, we are talking about pornography, and not about pornography.
And even within this pornography, Anglo-Saxon pornography is different from the Japanese one, and only by going back two decades, towards the 80s and 90s, and choosing in Italy, we find a completely different pornography, and unique in the world, and in the history of modern Western pornography.
So I am referring mostly to American industrial pornography which occupies most of the big porn sites on the internet. Otherwise I will specify what I mean.
In any case, I would like to distinguish three cases:
- what I think is beautiful
- what I think is bad
- what others think it is, and why it is moralistic and opportunistic bullshit
First, we need to specify a few things. Porn cinema is, in fact, a cinema. It is made up of actors, or people who act.
Why is it important to specify this? Because, for example, Sylvester Stallone has made films where he claimed to be a boxer, but also films where he claimed to be a green cap. Trouble is, Sylvester Stallone has NEVER been either in his life.
Consequently, looking at Rocky you do not see how Sylvester Stallone is as a boxer, and you cannot evaluate his skill as Rocky is a fictional character, just as it is not possible to understand if he is a good "commando" by observing him in Rambo, since, also in this case, he is acting.
This is important because it is not understood when it comes to porn: thinking that Valentina Nappi is very good in bed makes no sense, just like thinking that Sylvester Stallone was a great Marines: we are observing an acting. You and I don't know what Valentina Nappi is like in bed: we know how she pretends to be. Maybe in private she doesn't even like anal, and she doesn't, just as Stallone has never been in the military, nor has he ever tried. She is an actress, and therefore acts.
I repeat: it is such an obvious truth that there should be no need to specify it, but people prefer to believe that it is not a play.
This thing has a correspondent in the so-called GFE, the GirlFriend Experience that prostitutes offer to customers: all customers and users prefer to think that it is real, and that the girl is really happy to see you again, and that she missed you.
Similarly, when you are a client of Valentina Nappi, you prefer to believe in her Anal Slut Experience, and I repeat: when you watch a porn you are a client of the actress, exactly as it would be if you called a prostitute and asked her to act a porn in front of you. , paying it.
The main objection to this statement comes from the fact that physical intercourse seems to exist: this belief would probably cease if you could watch a porn set, but in any case, the fact that someone sticks something in your ass does not imply that you are having anal sex. : in hospitals they keep stuffing things up their asses, but it has nothing to do with sex. The exact same action is fist fucking if you do it on a porn set, and a proctological inspection if you do it in the hospital.
And so let's settle one thing: the porn actor / actress performance is a play. Watching these people doing porn you know NOTHING about what they are like in bed and what they like to do – you just know how good they are at acting.
As Dolph Lundgren is a true boxer (and still fights in senior tournaments), while Stallone in the ring was a recognized half-saw Lundgren had to explain the basics on set. And he used a stunt double.
Rocky Balboa, like Valentina Nappi, are fictional characters.
The actors obviously exist in the flesh. And they act.
Having said that, what do I think?
The modern American industrial porn that is popular on the internet, and its consumption, in cultural terms, has pros and cons.
Let's start with the pros:
- teaches a fundamental truth, namely that sex can appear together with an emotional relationship, or alone. Sex and affectivity can interact, appear together, appear alone, but they are two completely distinct phenomena. The great lesson, or the message, that porn is very effective in conveying is precisely this : sex and affectivity are two different and distinct phenomena, which may or may not appear together. And it is useful and good for young people to know.
- At one time, sex was characterized by reproduction, which if it was not the reason for doing so remained looming over the lovers, very often married. Today, reproduction is a very rare phenomenon, and 999.9% of sexual intercourse occurs for pure pleasure. Consequently, the narrative is focused on pleasure and no longer on family or reproduction, because it reflects the reality of the facts. the famous sexologist Randone does it.
- The "porn addiction" is a mere opinion based on a science so bland that in comparison the Yeti appears to be a certainty. The fact that habits exist and it is hard to abandon them is not enough to diagnose an "addiction": everyone eats three times a day without needing them, everyone sits at the table in the evening, and many other habits that would be very difficult to eradicate. It is called the "comfort zone". But this is where we talk about "addiction": it is very difficult to break away from the weekend habit, but I have never heard that there is a weekend addiction. It is one of those invented problems that are built to support the Puritanism of some.
Let's go to the cons.
- The business model of modern porn is that to keep an actor or actress (let's say a person who only does that for a living, like Nappi) it takes an average of three million views per video. Now, if we look at one hour of sex, we get two dudes to fuck while three million are watching , that is, they are NOT having sex . An average of one hour of real sex versus three million hours of mere voyeurism is really low. In this sense we can certainly say that if those three million hours had been spent looking for a partner , even with a very low efficiency of one in ten thousand, there would have been much more sex, about three hundred times more. That is, porn doesn't push people to have more sex, it pushes them to do less. Paradoxically, porn is sexicidal.
- If we make a comparison with the porn of the 80s and early 90s, we find actors and actresses who are (physically), perfectly average, not particularly handsome, beautiful, gymnastic people. Sure they weren't ugly, but they weren't beautiful either. And many times they did things that were within the reach of any ordinary person. This pushed people to think they were suitable to do the same things, the sex clubs in central and northern Italy and in Europe were full. In today's porn you are nobody if you are not a black bodybuilder with forty centimeters of cock, and even as an actress you do not even exist if you do not have a model body, and in your twenties you have not taken two black cocks, model fire extinguisher in the ass, at the same time. (any reference to Sara Bell is wanted). This obviously discourages newcomers, who do not feel adequate, and therefore there is less sex, sex clubs languish and many swinger clubs languish or close. Even in the cinema, someone like Jessica Rizzo wouldn't even try if she was born a few years later. Also in this sense, porn is sexicidal because it creates a very strong barrier to entry.
- Today's porn follows entirely quantitative industrial standards. It means that in theory the styles, techniques and positions are so standardized that we could ask TÜV to introduce ISO / IEC standards for anal porn, BBW, BBC, and so on. How many centimeters is ball deep, how many bpm is "rough", etc. etc. The problem is that real sex is done by people who almost never meet this industry standard: why should we have coitus from behind while holding us crooked, since there is no camera to film? Of course, if you want an industry to exist you have to establish industrial standards, but obviously the effect has that many feel like production waste and don't even try to approach the world of playful sex. Again, porn is sexicidal.
Then there is a whole debate on porn as a revolutionary genre, and on the alleged intelligence of actresses as such. It is true that the myth of the intelligent prostitute has always existed, there are several pop songs that talk about it, but this myth is almost never supported by concrete facts (someone shows me something very intelligent said, or done, by very intelligent Moana Pozzi? Something that if I hear it I say "oh, how intelligent she is!").
This thing, in addition to Moana Pozzi (Cicciolina is much more intelligent, in the sense that at least she can boast a decent level as a professional chess player, and a fairly varied television career, so to speak) has exploded more than anything else with two actresses. who pretended to be smart: Stoya and Sasha Gray.
The trouble is that, if we go to the facts, it was enough to have attended a decent high school to understand that Sasha Gray's "existentialism" had nothing to do with existentialism in a philosophical sense, and that it was believed only in the Anglo-Saxon world , where it is enough to name a vaguely philosopher word to be considered philosophers. Sasha Gray has never said anything existentialist, in the sense that it would have allowed him to pass a test in the fourth grade. Sasha Gray's is not "existentialism", and the few things she has babbled on about it are inconsistent rants. In short, if Fusaro were a woman, it would have been Sasha Gray.
Same thing about Stoya, who has always tried to tell us that she is an intelligent woman, but she was also very good (almost unbeatable) at hiding any evidence. If he's smart, it's a well-kept secret.
Of course, there are numerous porn stars who have a pile of degrees and PhDs (there are two that have PhDs), but paradoxically these women (who, thanks to MBAs, have managed their wealth professionally and got rich) have not NEVER bet on intelligence to create their characters. To focus on the image of intelligent porn stars are always actresses who have no proof of their intelligence, much less academically.
And they are almost never male, which tells us a lot about the operation they are trying to operate: "whore yes, but smart". No male who spends time fucking needs to hide behind intelligence, or make people suspect that he does things smarter than others. (which was said of Moana Pozzi, who instead claimed to fuck like any other).
Even the fact that porn actresses were often dubbed in Italian also raises some suspicion. Manya was an exception.
In short, a form of sublimation: I'm not watching a girl who acts to suck cocks: I'm watching a doctor who acts to suck cocks with intelligence. A way like any other to get rid of some sense of guilt, the result of some Puritan education.
Compared to the 1980s, when Italy was a reference point in the world of porn, today it is clearly the province . Siffredi is trying to do something good, but all he does is supply Hollywood with a professional body: Italy is the new Hungary.
This provincialism is very noticeable in terms of imitation: the provincial who says "let's do as they do in the city". I am not referring to Siffredi, who has his own "style": I am referring instead to directors (who have completely disappeared, there are no longer many people like Salieri to name one) and to porn actresses.
Let me be clear, being a porn actress must be tough: since Italy forgives you if you are successful, all porn actresses call themselves porn stars, as if every person who joggers calls himself Olympic champion, or if every actor calls himself a star. . As if acting a blowjob in front of a camera were enough to be a star. (Hint: swallowing your cock all at once is not a "blowjob." doing these epiglottis inspections is a little laugh.)
The provincialism of these pornstars (that Selen was a wooden pussy was always said, and like all provincial when her boobs fell she discovered God) manifests itself in many ways.
First, they confuse the scandal they are causing in the country with a "revolution they would be making". A far too cumbersome example is Valentina Nappi with her crusade against jealousy. Okay, she's in an open couple and can't stand jealous men. There is. And it's also obvious: if you don't like open relationships, don't be with a porn actress.
But from here to make a crusade against jealousy we pass: like pride, avarice, lust, envy, anger and sloth, it is true that jealousy is the basis of many crimes , but on the other hand , all deadly sins boast the same primacy : a public crusade against deadly sins does not seem like all this news. Others have already tried.
Envy, anger or avarice are also the basis of many crimes, Nappi instead gives priority to jealousy, but has the same chance of winning as all those who have tried to eradicate envy or avarice: let's say that no English bookmaker will give 'Nappi for winning in eradicating jealousy. Just as others, like the church, have had little success in eradicating the deadly sins: human nature is what it is.
And like all "smart" provincial porn actresses, Nappi falls into her "artistic" contradictions: making cuckold movies, for example. It is a genre that in the end is built around jealousy: in the genre normally the jealous husband remains helpless while mighty blacks bang his wife, but all that is said in the film is that this is humiliating, almost a retaliation or a punishment, and certainly a Negro victory. And this is the contradiction. How the open couple is humiliating for the husband WITHOUT this having to do with possession, only Nappi knows, but I certainly don't go into its contradictions: after all, this is the character that has to be built on himself in order to make ends meet by acting out anal sex scenes.
I repeat: today Italy, in the world of porn, is a province of the American empire. People like Siffredi who do the Hard Academy are just the equivalent of the entrepreneurs of the Roman provinces who trafficked (legally) slaves with Rome (Siffredi's handmaids then end up on Legalporno / Analvids, blacked and others), and what is done in the province is to imitate without understanding . “We do as they do in the metropolis”, they say in the provinces. Of course, you can also create in Italy a thriving Manga comics industry in Bergamo, or K-Pop in Ascoli Piceno.
But you will be the periphery of an empire that decides the route. Spaghetti western doesn't mean anything until I hear about spaghetti porn. That doesn't exist. Does it say anything?
Porn and race.
Since the center of industrial pornography on the internet is the US, and you can't do anything in the US without talking about race, there is this proliferation of interracial. The interracial breaks through for so many reasons, which are each a denial of what "intelligent" porn stars say they are fighting for. They are liked by males of all races for several reasons.
- priapism and self-esteem. The idea of being attractive or of exercising attraction, or of being appreciated for the qualities of one's cock is a forbidden dream of any male. A genre where males exert an irresistible magnetic attraction on women due to their big dick, therefore, is the symbolic fulfillment of this desire. The trouble is that, in fact, it is a form of possession: the woman is mine because I have a big cock that she cannot resist. How this goes against the concept of male possession, only the "smart stars" who then shoot IR porn know, but as I said the province is just imitation, it has no coherence. He says what needs to be said and does what needs to be done, regardless of whether the two are in blatant contrast.
- situation and plot. IR porn is the only porn in which you will see a minimum of situation and history. The story is always the same, of the woman who does not enjoy with whites but only with blacks, and always begins with a certain erotic tension, in the sense that IR is the only porn where they make out and caress each other first. The actresses are asked to play a total abandonment to the power of the big black cock, or to communicate that a big cock does not only possess their body, but also in depth, up to the soul. In short, not only does the big cock possess the woman, but it does it up to the soul. Once again, completely inconsistent with the message of those who verbally oppose the idea of possession, which is often also represented with creampie / breeding: I possess it so deeply that it allows itself to become pregnant. But let's be clear, we are against jealousy and possession.
- revenge or hatefuck. All peoples and groups who feel defeated by history react by building the same narrative: but our males are more powerful and they fuck your women. Here possession is declined to ethnic groups, but it is always possession. Oddly, none of those who oppose the concept of possession seem to have anything against this message when making IR movies: indeed, they often do so consciously. As I said before, you have to pay the bills.
The claim that this decreases racial tension is ridiculous, for obvious reasons: "I take the woman who belongs to your ethnic group, and she likes it" is not the kind of message that brings reconciliation, but as if not even white males who say they like him or are not jealous are not enough to tell the truth: if they are not jealous it is only of the negro who bangs his wife and only because they do not perceive the negro as a person.
Interracial is the new zoophilia.
You cannot be jealous if your wife goes with another person if this is not a person but just a big animated dildo: to quote Hitler, "the black is only valid for one's body, having no spiritual characteristics"
The proof is that there are also whites with huge peas (Rasputin, Sin, etc), but they are never attributed the magical power to enslave women to pleasure, to possess them to the soul, and all the magic of the BBC .
Not for nothing, in the world of gay porn there is interracial but the narrative is very different.
And I repeat: how all this would go against the concept of possession, when it introduces the concept of a blonde woman owned by the white group, which prefers to be owned by that of blacks, only Nappi knows.
In general, is porn making the costume revolution?
Definitely not, because his ghettoization is the symbol of his sexual impotence. We are not talking about the 70s, when couples and families could go, with the Unit under their arm, to the cinema to see Deep Throat. And neither of Ultimo Tango, which ended up in the mainstream cinema circuits. Here we are talking about something that was born in a ghetto, the red light district of the Internet, and remains there.
It has the same chance of making a sexual revolution that the San Pauli district has of becoming the new architectural style of the city of Hamburg. It just… doesn't happen.
Does the fact that the self-appointed porn star gives scandal produce a healthy shock that makes society evolve? Obviously not. The first reason is that we are in the province, and nothing that happens in the center of the empire affects the costumes, if not on an aesthetic level (as are the costumes) but not on an ideal level.
The second reason is that nothing that happens in the provinces has any effect on the empire: the USA imports a lot of good wine from Italy and France, but in general they don't understand anything about wine. It's just cool to drink Italian wine.
The level of interaction is too low. Furthermore, the industry is very efficient, and since the evolution of society is not part of the product, it is simply not produced. All the resources invested are used to make money.
But does porn change the sexual mores of the people who consume it, at least? Ni. In the sense that all these people would like to do porn, they try, but punctually the way they do it is "colonized" by the industry, which sees a novelty and a new niche, and for ordinary people there is none. more hope.
Many genres formerly practiced as "amateurs" (amateur, cuckold, swingers, milf, granny, dogging) were born "from below", that is, from ordinary people who wanted to do porn, that is, sex for recreational purposes.
But as soon as the industry realizes that there is space, it swoops with its production methods and sweeps away all that is "artisanal". In times of pandemic, dogging has developed a lot: as soon as the industry became aware of this new sector, it swooped in with its professionals, and today you will find the usual two or three dogging "stars" who monopolize environment. The same happened with the swingers world, and even with the "amateur" world, which today is completely fake.
Porn doesn't change habits, it just assimilates the new consumer sectors to its industrial standards: sooner or later the very well-trained superstars who do things with the fisheye lens (to enlarge males and curves) with gigantic gym blacks with 40 cm of cock will be the minimum requirement to fuck, and ordinary people will form freemasonry and secret sects to get together with ordinary people in peace.
And Nappi will come to terms with it: it's part of the problem she says she wants to solve. If he says what he says it is marketing, in the sense that this character is actually functional to sell the product. In short, being an actress… she acts.
And yes, "the work of actresses and actors is acting" should be the warning at the beginning of any porn. Because as usual, it's the obvious things that go unnoticed.
In short, porn is fun, eat it as well, I consume it, but I advise against believing it.