when I wrote the previous article , where I advised Italians to ask themselves questions about democracy, I was "reproached" for having taken it too "abstractly". Even if I think I have posed a problem that is far too concrete (if a people has the political system they find best), the request is to get into the gossip about Draghi.

What should I say? Draghi's name has been repeatedly mentioned in the last two years by all the newspapers of the GEDI group, that is, owned by the Elkanns. So we know Draghi was on their agenda. Having said that, we know who the puppeteer who moved Renzi was. It is a French automobile company with an Italian name. (Because you noticed, right, that today "fiat" is a French company, right?)

Conte left at the height of popularity, which tells me that maybe you will find him at stake as President of the Republic. It is clear that he remains in politics (he made a nice rally immediately after his departure) and it is clear that the patrimony of approval must be spent. They will probably soak him for some time, then the first votes for the next president will fail, and when it comes to the absolute majority vote poof, Beppe Conte will emerge, and among the general applause he will become the new president of the Republic. Everyone will vote for it, first of all to get rid of it. Second, they will vote because the alternative would be Draghi, who will know how to make himself hated.

The newspapers of the Elkann group, moreover, began with a kind of personality cult that in comparison Stalin seems Kafka, where it tells of his life, of his school, of when he walked on water, of when Merkel saved ( who was unaware that she needed help, you see how prescient), when she saved Europe, when she saved the Solar System, when she saved Figa as we know it today, when she defeated the Vegans (not c 'it was Daisuke to guide Grendizer, as the yellow faces say. It was Mario), and all when. Draghi's narcissistic orgy was matched only by that of Berlusconi, made by Emilio “beagle” Fede. But this time stronger.

When "journalism" gets to this point:

what else is there to add?

The funny thing is that Draghi's is being sold as a technical government, without the conditions being met. First of all, unlike in Monti's case, there is no fire to put out. The situation of the spread is quite calm, covid has now been a daily reality for more than a year, and so on.

Monti went to power with newspapers writing “Be quick!”, Here honestly the government collapsed because Mister Eighties lent himself to bring it down. Of course, there are 209 billion euros to be allocated, but it doesn't seem like an emergency: indeed, it seems like good news.

you have faced a pandemic with a government whose main party does not believe in vaccines, and is fighting chemtrails. If you didn't want an emergency government at the time, why are you syruping it now? Do you have trucks of coffins that leave Bergamo?

If you think that the previous government was so inept that it did not know how to manage the return of the sun (at least 209 billion of the sun), and you use Draghi as a last resort, well: you have played EVERY chance for Draghi to form a "technical government" ".

Try asking yourself a question: what happens if the Draghi government falls because MAtteo AnniOottanta Renzi pulls the plug? Since 'Draghi' is the last resort, and you wanted to go without any particular reasons (as if Silla had been elected dictator because the pigeons shit too much on the chariots), now the result is that you are at the last ratio without a ' emergency that compacts the government majority.

Moral: if a party withdraws from the majority that supports Draghi, not only does Draghi fall, but you have played the last resort.

You will say: well, at most we return to vote. All right. And who are you going to vote with? Again with the same protagonists of the last time? And would that be a solution? I mean, did you put Dragons there because the former ones seemed inadequate to you, and once dragons have fallen, you go and elect them again, hoping that one inadequate prevails over the other?

So no, this solution is not a solution. Draghi, being the last resort, but without an ongoing emergency, will be under constant blackmail by all the parties of the "majority Ursula", which supports him. The most political government imaginable, subject to a constant shower of crossed vetoes.

And when there are crossed vetoes and 209 billion on the table, we know what happens. That there is no more 209 billion on the table.

And speaking of "majority Ursula". Because no empty box sells well in Italy, without having a foreign name. It's provincialism, darling.

First of all, there is already an Italian name for this: pentapartito. I don't understand why to call "Ursula government" something that should at best be called "LaMalfa government".

But let's go even further. The “Ursula majority” (the real one) did not form around the name of Ursula. It was formed around the PROGRAM that Ursula discussed with the political forces. And the discussion was public (even if the lazy Italian journalists were too busy exploring the rooms of a well-known Belgian brothel near the European Parliament and therefore didn't notice).

to create an “Ursula” government, as happened for “Ursula”, the program must be known BEFORE the vote. And let it be voted on. Do you know anything about Draghi's program?

Because here is the point. Unless Draghi is thaumaturgic just because he exists, this enthusiasm could only be justified if Draghi told someone his program. But Draghi did NOT state his program. So why does Draghi make everyone happy?

The political situation you are in today looks more like a mental illness than a political situation. The parties remained the same. The leaders remained the same. You changed a guy out of the pocket for another guy out of the pocket. But not from the elections. What should change?

In short, I have little to comment. All I've seen is:

• Since the last elections, the newspapers of the GEDI group have made the name of Draghi about twice a month. Interview here, Opinion there. Draghi is evidently on the agenda of the property of GEDI, that is, of the Elkanns.
• At one point Renzi arrives and pulls the plug, for no apparent reason. It is easy to deduce who Renzi's puppeteer is.
• Since there is no other government, Mattarella takes Draghi out of his pocket. Why'? Where does his name come from? Boh? Could it have something to do with the fact that the GEDI Group has been making Draghi's name every two weeks in every newspaper for the past few years?
• Draghi arrives and everyone is happy because the spread drops. As if the last time Cazzo di Ferro of the situation lowered the spread, the Italians were not done all the harm possible.
• The Italians are exulting with joy: finally we seem like a normal country.

Sara'. It sure sounds like a cognitive dissonance to me.

If not some mental illness.

Oh, by the way: where are those who had to take away television or newspapers from Berlusconi, because the monopoly had to be avoided?