The mountain of shit theory

Government crisis: let’s talk about Freemasonry.

A political saying goes that power is always under siege. The only exception is for occult power, that is, the power that is not seen. So to understand who has the power, you have to look for the names that NEVER appear in the press, although there would be a lot to write about these people.

There are few words that seem banned from Italian newspapers, one is "cocaine", which I have already spoken about when poor Willy was killed by a gang of cocaine dealers, and another is "Freemasonry".

Unlike other foreign Freemasonry which it claims to resemble, Italian Freemasonry has two components: one of an esoteric sect, and a subversive component. When I say subversive I mean those plans that serve to bring the rent bourgeoisie to dominate democratic politics, when I say "esoteric" I mean that a part of this Freemasonry forms internal subgroups that have contacts (or try to infiltrate) other esoteric / religious groups (including the Catholic Church, Jewish communities, and now also the Islamic communities), but has no qualms with any other group: Satanists, Wiccans, neo-Templars, Newage groups, Damanhurians and so on and so forth will also infiltrate .

My knowledge comes a lot, in fact, from what I learned when I ran an esoteric website, about 20 years ago, and from the contacts I made, which remained in the environment while I left it. (I think that religion and the occult can give right answers to any wrong question , but you have to study magical thinking from a logical point of view to understand what it means) and I must say that the landscape has not changed much except for a few factors essential.

So, the description I have given will have raised some questions:

Mainly because whoever turns to religion and occultism is a person in difficulty, very often economic. When these esoteric groups recruit from the petty bourgeoisie, it is the kind of adept that Freemasonry seeks. But also for other purposes, for example when a certain Negrini founded a Thelemic Freemasonry (= inspired by Crowley) many Masons infiltrated it because the initiation rituals were almost all sexual. To fuck, in short. “It was not a society of philosophers”, as Barbero would say.

It is the kind of infiltration that aims to gain power in the ranks of the state, professional corporations, press, TV, industry, universities.

Is there a common thread? Yes, internal democracy. They are interested in the situation in which the local leader is elected by voting within the organization, preferably behind closed doors. In this case, by infiltrating it, they slowly manage to elect the ruling class and take control of the group. Any group where the leader is elected by internal consensus and the election is quite opaque, is an easy prey to Freemasonry, including the Mafia and the Camorra, which are now very infiltrated. (Freemasonry does not ally itself with anyone, it infiltrates, metastasizes and degrades). Anyone who thinks that Gelli was in charge did not understand how it worked: Gelli must have been infiltrated and disrupted so much that he can be considered a puppet. Rather expendable, apparently.

There is also another foot of Freemasonry, which are the peons, and which are tolerated even if they have no particular power to offer to Freemasonry: small shopkeepers, entrepreneurs and other losers who believe they can access the big world. They don't know that Freemasonry is continually divided into subgroups, so the baker who hopes to know the powerful will never meet them. I say peons because if you are already rich and powerful you skip the whole process and go directly to the upper ranks.

How is the situation in Italy? Freemasonry, like all political phenomena, has a right and a left, plus a large amount of "bushes", the corner lodges, groups that however are colonized since double or triple affiliation is almost always seen with favor.

However, in their wacky mo (n) do, the view looks like this:

But regarding ALAM I used some strange terms like Templar-fascist mysticism. What does it mean? It means, for example, that I would not be surprised if reopening the investigation into the White One it turns out that all the killers were members. And I wouldn't be surprised if from the same investigation I learned that the first judge who dealt with it (going to butterflies) was also a member. Which implies that I would not be surprised if ALAM dominated many of the Emilian prosecutors with strong female presences. Let me be clear, I 'm not saying that this is the case, it serves to make people understand in which areas I would not be surprised if in the future it emerges that this is the case. For now it has not emerged, and I have no precise data, but I think you understand what I expect from those who are immersed in "Templar-fascist mysticism": the policeman who believes himself to be a Templar and believes that his work is a crusade against Muslims (and he comes out in Uno Bianca to kill them) is of that type.

But, as I was saying, if a woman is a fascist she is important and is in a party where the leader is elected in some way: parties, universities or local politics. I wouldn't be surprised if Meloni was part of it, say, (but I'm not saying she is part of it, I'm just saying she would be a coveted candidate). In short, if in politics you see women who make the fascist salute, they are almost always in ALAM.

If the career mechanisms are opaque and your career depends on the decision of a group of others, you can assume that your institution / company has been infiltrated and controlled by Freemasonry. It is the ideal prey.

Having said that, why do I see Freemasonry in this fall of government? For several reasons.

The signs are all there, it wouldn't surprise me if this whole story was actually the public part of a clash between Freemasons, or an alliance between Freemasons against a non-Mason.

Are there also non-Masonic parties? Sure. Political leaders are well acquainted with these means and methods: they are invited to be part of Freemasonry, they are part of it and then they leave it, or they are part of it and do not leave it, etc. When a party has a head designated by statute (e.g. Forza Italia Berlusconi President, Di Pietro list, Mastella) or a leader who does not indicate in a democratic method the method to remove him from the top of the party, he usually knows that if he appoints the assembly which elects the leader OR accepts the direct election of the leader by the members, tomorrow Freemasonry will infiltrate him, dismiss the founder and take control. Parties where the founder cannot be removed are usually parties to defend themselves .

Now you will ask yourself if it is possible to establish which Freemasonry someone is in. It is possible to do this only in some cases, because in the end there is no Freemasonry that conquers a party: they all do. They all have men in every party. There is no party of a single Freemasonry, also because Freemasonry infiltrates each other.

Then one prevails, but the others are present in the same party. So the Masonic priority is that the career method that allows infiltration be maintained, and then that the best one wins. (Freemasonries infiltrate each other, by the way).

In any case, in some cases you can do it, but they are few, let's say a couple:

Even the list of official members is never complete: it is possible for them to register "by ear" of the Maestro, that is, the inscription not documented on paper (to protect illustrious members, such as bishops and financial men) or (guess who practices it between the two mentioned) the instruction "on the sword", as the nobles did when they appointed a Templar knight by putting the sword on his shoulder. In both cases, the identity of the subscriber is secret.

You will find that Freemasonry has hate knowledge, so 'as he hated any other system for allocating the power that is in any way merit: for example, knows that Masonic beginning of the pandemic to command the experts let there be a "hat" of politicians that covered the voices of scientists making them appear in conflict with each other. This is also their signature. You may think that the government believes in political direction, but judging by the fact that a panel of experts has been appointed to manage the Recovery Fund, without the selection criteria being clear, I would say that the smell of Freemasonry is very strong.

Exactly what happened is known only to those inside. The problem of Italian Freemasonry is that a certain skill in infiltrating is then replaced by a complete mediocrity in governing what has been conquered. For example, they have infiltrated almost the entire press (I said: opacity and co-optation), so if you see patafascist posts in the newspapers from time to time, even on the left, you shouldn't be surprised: it's an apron.

Why is Freemasonry mediocre in managing power? Well, let's take ALAM: with 33 degrees of initiation "in a continuum", you can understand how many people get pissed off: even if each degree had 99% of the power of the higher one, the last degree below is expected to have the 0.71 of the first, the highest one. The trouble is that in ALAM the Queen of Jordan Zein al-Sharaf Talal (1916-1994), mother of King Hussein of Jordan, was given the 33rd and final degree by Giovanni Ghinazzi. Now, you will understand that giving 70% of the power of a queen to any of the 28,000 official members is "hard work". Moreover, a hierarchy with 33 degrees cannot work even if you order it in a "continuum", whatever that means. If the figure is much less than 99% (so continuum stocazzo), then the peons have only to lick the grandmaster's bathtub and smell the scent of power (or the stench of the ass). They will never see any advantage, which they could not have gained by spending their time in honest work.

Not for nothing, Palazzo Vitelleschi is full of internal quarrels, stomach ache towards the Sovereign Grand Commander Grand Master, who presides over the highest ranks, splits and the formation of unrecognized lodges which then try to interfere in internal life through the mechanism of double or triple affiliation. Such a thing cannot function as an organization: this Masonic lodge suffers from the same disease that it tries to spread in the institutions it conquers. The very idea that a hierarchy that has 33 degrees in only ~ 30,000 members is an "organization" is more pathetic than ridiculous. In any case, if you are rich & important, like a queen, you can pay and get to the first degree right away. Which increases the peons' turnaround. Toto ', who was a member of ALAM, did not go through the whole process. (Maybe he was laughing at it?).

Even at Palazzo Giustiniani (which is the GOI) they do not fare less: there the degrees are a quantity that is humanly manageable as an "organization", but the double card is normally encouraged / tolerated, therefore they are infiltrated by the opponents (as opponents from them). The problem is that they are at the opposite extreme: three degrees is too low to be resistant to infiltration. So they are in turn very infiltrated.

Another thing: the habit of having followers "by ear" of the Master implies the formation of sub-lodges, also called "angular", which are apparently detached from the mother obedience, such as Propaganda and Propaganda 2, which apparently they were detached from mother obediences, if not officially repudiated, but double affiliation (secret) was practically the norm. GOI has the opposite problem to ALAM: when your organization has too few ranks it is easy to climb, and therefore both internal diasporas and opponents have infiltrated the GOI, which struggles to make decisions consistent with some strategy.

So if we take under examination the fall of the government (which clearly took place in the odor of Freemasonry, as well as its formation, and as its survival, due to the method ), the only possible explanation is that it was not due to ONE lodge, but to the only action on which all Freemasonry agrees: infiltrate everywhere and get rid of any activity that could invalidate Freemasonry as a unicum.

For example: Freemasonry deeply detests Germany because one of the 4 secret services regularly intercepts it, and as happened with Scientology it can also lead politicians to intervene harshly: German Freemasons are heavily controlled by TWO secret services, one state the BfV , and sixteen of the Lander (LfV) and this bothers the Masons very much, who are not very able to manage complexity.

They are also in hatred of the local church (and therefore also of the CDU / CSU) mainly attending the Protestant world, which is close to the English Protestant world, from which they were accepted.

For the same reason, Freemasonry hates the European Union, because they have never managed to organize and manage its complexity to effectively infiltrate it. They also fail to infiltrate the SIS. The constant of Freemasonry is complete organizational disaster when it comes to running the field. So the anti-EU propaganda and the sovereign releases of the Italian newspapers are mainly the work of Freemasons, so to speak. Freemasons are literally obsessed with the mass media, and have infiltrated and colonized virtually all Italian newsrooms.

My personal opinion is that Renzi is in some way an opponent of Freemasonry, or that she is disliked by them today, in particular one who has many infiltrators in the police and the judiciary (I am also referring to his inquiries), and tried to fight their takeover of the Recovery Fund. I don't think Renzi did it for high ideals, but since I know who infects some powers of attorney and I know what Freemasonry belongs to, I think he stepped on the toes of those who want to manage that money, and these have moved their pawns.

And this vote of confidence is a way of saying to Renzi: we will also be divided, but on the important things we are all there. And so I am not surprised by the almost unanimous support of the press (Journalists' Order: opacity and co-optation, remember?)
who is magnifying Conte.

But here's the reason to rest assured. Because once they get their hands on that money, they won't be able to handle it. An organization with 33 degrees does not have the faintest chance of ordering a pizza in less than three months of internal dialectics. Nor to make a project and follow it consistently.

However, they are very good at destroying other people's projects. You smell Freemasonry when something does NOT work but you don't understand why everyone behaves so irrationally.

What will happen is simply that they will start sabotaging each other, sabotaging themselves, and sabotaging the project. They will be able to get 209 billion and make sure that no spider gets out of the hole, but they won't get the spider out of the hole either.

Because a constant of Freemasonry is precisely this: it has a lot of power, but it only keeps the crumbs, and only for the higher degrees. The rest is sabotaged and destroyed in an explosion of mediocrity and an internal organization that would be fun if it weren't too cringe .

Freemasons are simply an organizational cancer, which like cancer can be very effective in harming the host, which like cancer metastasizes very quickly, but is unable to do anything positive with that power.

And this, of course, means that the high-ranking adept receives only the crumbs of some career, which, moreover, he could have obtained with the same commitment by working honestly, while the low-ranking adept normally gets nothing.

Only when they are united in the intent to destroy something are they able to act, but then they collect nothing, or almost nothing.

And that's what's going to happen to this government.

For the rest, a simple pattern applies: Freemasonry is fine in times of fat cows. When an economic crisis comes, those in the upper grades keep the pennies they have, hold tight to the power they have and their income, those in the lower grades don't beat a nail and get bored.

MEdiocri, destructive and scoundrels. Like the protagonists of this "government crisis", after all.