It happens in Sweden
Elections have been held in Sweden, and even if the press has talked little about them, the result is a major advance by a party that can be considered a far-right party. Which wants to bring Sweden back to the conditions in which it was a kind of totem for the left. And here the curtain opens on contradictions.
But the problem is not so much the contradiction of a conservative who wants to restore the normal situation of extreme progressivism. The problem is a precise cause and effect relationship.
Because now, if Sweden also behaves like this in politics, one thing is clear: when a high component of people of a certain religion emigrate to a country, or from specific areas (which I will not mention in this post) then the fascists win.
I know that now many will say “eh, but that's because blablabla mimimi rava et fava”. But I don't listen, because the point is not why. It's the what.
We are seeing that ANY country has an idiosyncratic group of immigrants which, when it increases in number, leads to fascism.
Cause, consequence. The group can change by continent, but the discourse does not change very much.
And the problem is a cause and effect phenomenon. Some migratory flows and poofs appear: no matter how progressive the country is, the fascist formations gain enormous support.
And if before someone told me “but in Scandinavia it doesn't happen, so it's a problem of culture and mentality and of school and blablablabla”, now there are no more excuses. It also happened in Sweden.
But this would already be an unnecessary in-depth study. In the sense that if I see that all those who launch themselves from the sixth floor die, I can deduce that by launching from the sixth floor they will die, even without knowing Newton's laws, nor knowing Relativity.
And the problem is simply this: have we ever taken this cause-and-effect relationship into account in assessments regarding immigration?
The thing we observe, then, is that every nation seems to have idiosyncratic populations. For example, the US has a strong idiosyncrasy with Mexico, but when it comes to other countries they are much more relaxed, and have quietly digested millions of Chinese, Indians, and others.
Each country, therefore, has its own specific idiosyncrasy. This means that we must also take this into account. The Italians were quite relaxed in welcoming the latest wave of Ukrainians, while the refugees fleeing the war in Syria created a very different effect.
This means that some effects are completely predictable, as long as you know which ethnic groups are causing the idiosyncrasy of a nation.
But nobody wants to watch what happens. It is said that Putin financed that party in Sweden, ignoring that that party does NOT need help, because it can count on the copious help of blind people, who in the name of ideology reject the mere observation of reality.
- Integration of an ethnic group is not always possible.
- Some ethnic groups do not integrate.
- When integration fails, fascism inevitably comes.
These are the facts that we observe, and if it also happens in Sweden, there are no counter-examples that hold.