Luana, the massacre and hatred.

I read about the death on poor Luana's work, and there is little to say about this. If a person manages to slip under a roller, with their whole body, in 2021, someone has removed some protections. Because the MINIMUM safety level of any modern machine should prevent even the limbs or fingers from getting there. Point.

There is no doubt that it is a tragedy, without ifs and buts. The employer must rot in prison for having removed the protections, or not having supervised their removal. Whether the Corriere della Sera likes it or not, there is negligence, and it is criminal negligence. I repeat: not even the little finger must have access to that roller. If one enters with the whole body, or almost, protections have been removed, and important ones too.

Alongside this tragedy, I see two other things that are not talked about.

The first is the massacre. Unfortunately Luana is not the only victim of the year. The victims of deaths at work are about 1100 every year, according to ISTAT data. And I'm talking about victims, because according to inail, people disabled by accidents are 3-4 times as many, depending on the years.

There is a massacre, which the newspapers do not mention, which is perpetuated every day. If we consider EVERY day of the year working, there are about 3 deaths a day. If we consider 220 workers, that's ~ 5 deaths a day.

Not only Luana died that day. Another 3-5 people died. It is a massacre that is repeated every year, which is not mentioned. Or, we only talk if it is a woman and mom.

And here we come to the third point: hatred. Because there is a difference between Luana and the other 3-5 who died at work on the same day.

Luana was a woman and a mother.

The others were men (some even fathers).

The percentage of men who died at work in Italy ranges from 93% to 95%, depending on the years. There have been 97% years. It means that 20 to 30 males die for each Luana.

But they never end in the newspapers. This is the hate I'm talking about. The monstrous hatred to which the male gender is subjected. It is quite right to put Luana on the front page, who died due to the – grave, evident and indubitable – fault of her employer. But that day another 3-5 people died on the job. That didn't make it to the front page.

Because they weren't women. Why weren't they photogenic and didn't have instagram selfies to show? But more likely, more statistically, because they were men.

The last time a man who died at work was in the papers was when six workers were burned alive in a steel mill, and the owner was a foreigner. When the owner is Italian, we don't hear those screaming burned alive. Not in the Italian bosses' newspapers, of course.

But what matters is that Italians had to wait for a woman to die in order to know that people die on the job. Such is the hatred towards males that no one hears them die when they are crushed by bulldozers, burned in foundries, suffocated in tanks, electrocuted, and all the horrendous deaths that occur at work.

If you are a boy and you are dying, no one hears you scream.

This is the measure of hatred. When you say that the average 95% of deaths at work are men, feminists usually tell you that there is a gender gap in wages. Aha. So 1000 people die every year, 4000 are maimed, and the problem is a bad statistic?

Seriously?

Luana's case is only a symptom, mind you. The fact that if the beautiful chick dies on duty ends up on the front page, while 1000 men who died in an equally atrocious way, maybe the same day, scream but no one hears them, is a symptom.

A symptom of hatred.

Don't come and tell me that feminism is for equality. When we talk more about the gender gap than about deaths at work, it is clear that the problem is not equality. It is clearly hate.

Commemorating Luana's death and bringing it to the front pages is a must. Throwing the negligent employer into jail too.

But don't talk about the other five deaths at work on the same day, and NEVER talk about the THOUSAND who die each year at work, just because they're not women, it's hate.

It is a symptom of the hatred of males in which we are wallowing today, and within which entire generations of males are growing.

Don't complain if they get more and more ferocious, aggressive and violent.

To raise a puppy in hatred, to tell him that he can die burned alive under a cast iron so no one hears him scream, to tell him that he is expendable, expendable, he will become ferocious. Violent. Ruthless.

You can't tell a man that if he gets crushed by a crane nobody gives a shit and nobody hears him scream, and then tell him that he has to go to the streets in red shoes against femicide, along with those who accuse him of the privilege ( practically everything) male to die at work.

There will be many men at Luana's funeral, including politicians, because she has made it to the front page. At the funeral of the men who die, by the thousands, at work, there are only wives, mothers, and a few family members. This is the point.

Today, with the numbers that exist, death at work is a clear gender murder. The numbers are not explained otherwise. But it's a gender murder that you don't want to talk about, because ultimately the average feminist masturbates thinking of a cracked man struck by high tension at work. Because the contrast between Luana on the front page and none of the 1000 dead on the front page says this, and leaves no room for any doubt.

In this bath of hate, generalized and widespread, we are raising generations of males.

What could possibly go wrong?