These days we see pitiful scenes around, we hear alarming news, and at the same time a very strong anger grows when we see that at the end of the day, all that is happening is that the account of the previous malpractice arrives.
I mean, take the gas story. Now, how long have we been telling industrialists that they have to change their regime and that they have to change production to be low-carbon? How long have we been telling them to abandon fossil fuels? How long have we been telling them that this way of producing is not ecologically sustainable and that they had to change production systems to produce in a way that required fewer fossil fuels?
About 20.25 years.
What did they do? On the one hand, they have moved lobbies to delay climate agreements: 2020, 2025, 2030, 2037, 2040, 2050, and now there is talk of 2070.
On the other hand, they flooded the newspapers with news such as "from today our concierge has an electronic system that saves water when we water the company cactus", or "the new coffee machines will only use the energy of the green dolphin song".
Interesting. But the production methods remained intact.
Now comes a gas crisis, and for this reason an industrial system that had promised to be green by 2030 is completely in crisis because there is a lack of fossil sources.
And now the common citizen is being asked to save and keep their homes cold. Result: explosions of gas cylinders and deaths from stove poisoning, because no country is as flat as Belgium, and if in Bologna it makes sense to turn on the radiator in November, in Gaggio Montano (which is always the province of Bologna ) people will chatter their teeth, and they will use stoves of all kinds.
Those who already had stoves will continue with those, those who did not have them will buy gas stoves. Prepare the funeral.
But … and why does the ordinary citizen have to pay? If we enter homes, now all appliances range from class A to class A +++. Gas boilers, thanks to continuous revisions, are now almost always very efficient models. Can we say the same about companies? No. Both the gas was cheap.
Can you explain to me why those who have done their duty and use low consumption systems must make sacrifices to save industrialists who have not made innovation?
No, I have no mercy on the bar that will close for the very high bill, when I know very well that almost no one has LED lights, almost all of them make excessive use of ovens that are not made to be used in the bar, which make a criminal use air conditioning, and all.
While the old retired woman was passing out to buy an energy-saving boiler. No, no mercy.
Ditto for the storms. For twenty years now, municipalities have been told to stop cementing and the regions are asked to make hydrogeological adjustments. Canals, lakes, reservoirs, both to contain the water to be used in dry periods, and to channel and slow down the waters.
Anything.
Although the Italian population does not grow, houses are being built. And although every period of rain is a storm disaster and although every period of sun is a disaster, no one is planning the territory.
How can I have mercy for a population of building owners who get what they deserve?
Hard.
The press, of course, has strategies to FORCE people to take refuge in the rhetoric of pietism, or the rhetoric of the apocalypse, depending on the facts.
In the case of the storm, this happens:
- They could also avoid getting the fuck out of concrete, if they didn't want the devastation.
- But it was a thunderstorm / water bomb / cloud beast / meteorological antichrist of premature abelard grandmother type 3. It was not a normal occurrence.
My answer is simple: there are no "normal" weather events. Each event is unique.
- They could also avoid getting the fuck out of concrete, if they didn't want the devastation.
- but it is the fault of global warming premature supercazzola as if it were antani in nomine rava et fava.
We know that global warming exists and we know that extreme events will happen more and more often.
- They could also avoid getting the fuck out of concrete, if they didn't want the devastation.
- But a child died, how do you get to be so inhumane, guilt it hadaaaaa.
- The child died because of whoever cemented it. Even less pity. The judgment is even more severe.
- BUT his mom crieseeeeeee, you don't see the tearseeeee
- If he doesn't go shoot the mayor, he's an accomplice.
Another technique in use is that of emergency. Just look for the culprits, because we are in an emergency and here we need unity at all costs. This was done when COVID cut down on the health of Communion and Liberation as if nothing had happened, and it is done again with the history of gas.
- If the industrialists shut down because of gas it is because in the last 20 years they have given a shit about those who told them to turn production into something less energy-intensive.
- But there will be fifty thousand million million unemployed!
This is the first. Shut up and do not dare to go to the industrialists, who are losing jobs. My answer is that if 35% of industrialists close, the remaining 65% will take their place on the market. The government's problem is not to save those who close, but to reward those who don't close.
But we cannot say, silence, otherwise there are other unemployed !!!
- For years everyone has been whining at North Stream because they heard it was evil Germans. Then it closes, and it turns out that many were sucking from that tube. Maybe there could have been a contingency plan if someone had told the truth?
- But there will be fifty thousand million million unemployed, what are you doing, are you talking?
Again, do not disturb the industrialists, and the press they own, because in the end it is fair to say that our industrialists are good and the others bad. In reality, two questions about a systemic risk never taken into consideration should be asked.
In all the disasters that are seen, and that will be seen, the situation is always the same: they happen due to NEGLIGENCE, but when you try to find out more the journalists arrive and throw it into caciara with some alarm or with some catchphrase, and nobody succeeds anymore 'to understand that if the negligent are not punished (severely), it will happen again, and even stronger.
