Short legs.

I've been wanting to do a post about German Greens for some time (which are favorites, barring strange events, for the next stationery), but every time I get into it I see that there is another topic to open. For example, on the fact that the German greens are interested in the environment while the Italian ones are interested in the landscape (ie the value of Real Estate) I will post later.

But here I wanted to talk about the presidency. Because the Greens don't have a president. They have a presidency. Occupied by TWO people:

Annalena Baerbock
Robert Habeck

Since Habeck is more the philosophical one of the party, Baerbock is the frontwoman, the one you see in the newspapers, in short. And she's the one who has leadership aptitude.

Well.

If you think about it, in terms of gender equality the solution is intellectually valid. If not brilliant. In practice, it is a win-win solution for both males and females. The function is taken and assigned to TWO people, a male and a woman.

In this way equality is guaranteed (50% -50%) without cutting out anyone. After all, the presidency is not a deathmatch, so it should not be handled as "there will be only one".

And the Grünen are not alone. The SPD, the Social Democratic Party, also did the same thing. Its presidents are a man and a woman.

Saskia Esken
Norbert Walter-Borjans

Interesting, because at this point the patema of the PD is not clear. The men of the PD know for sure how their German counterpart is organized, since both are part of the European socialists. I mean, Zingaretti will have noticed that if he talks to the SPD presidency, sometimes a man answers and sometimes a woman answers: or did he mistake Esken for the cleaning lady?

At this point we return to the patema of the women of the PD: why not do the same thing? They are slaughtering themselves wondering "which chair to assign to women", when the answer could simply be "all".

It is enough to separate the function (the presidency, the secretariat, the undersecretariat, etc.) from the person, and decide that the function is exercised by TWO people. A man and a woman.

Is simple. In this way the situation is:

• which armchairs go to men? All.
• which armchairs go to women? All.

As you can see, this is the classic case of a win-win game. Everyone wins everything.

But then why are they slaughtering themselves? Well, it's simple: women aren't just asking for 50% of the command chairs. They ALSO want men removed.

This happens for two reasons. The first is that proposing a woman (from my current) instead of a man (from YOUR current) is a way like any other to take out a political opponent.

But there is a second issue: feminism.

Women who want positions of power aren't just interested in being in charge to contribute.

They also want to REMOVE power from men. Consequently they do not accept (and therefore do not propose) a solution that would take away ANY excuse from the males of the party.

Question: Do the women of the PD know that the SPD has a man and a woman in the presidency? Obviously yes: I don't think they mistaken Esken for the cleaning lady, or for Walter-Borjans' wife.

Yet this proposal is never mentioned. Strange, because these ladies are constantly mentioning Baerbock as their next idol. The adult Greta, in short. Is it possible that they don't know that Barbock is one of the TWO leaders of the greens?

They know very well, only they are not interested in equality, as they say they are, but in taking all the power by driving out men. This is the point.

For the women of the PD, "more space for women" is possible ONLY if it happens together with "less space for men". But we are not talking about space in percentage, but about space in absolute terms. Mere conquest of the territory.

Think how simple it would be: the Presidency of the Republic given to a couple of people, a man and a woman. The presidency of the council is given to two people, a man and a woman. The ministry given to two people, a man and a woman.

Instead of the usual "owner-deputy" pair, you would simply have "owner1-owner2". (no, they do not necessarily have to mate, they may not even have children together. Indeed, in my opinion it would be desirable that they were NOT married).

But, I repeat, the problem is precisely feminism. Feminist women do NOT want to have equality, they want domination and humiliation of the adversary.

And it is this example, of the SPD and of the Grünen and it is sufficient proof: if you are interested in equality between the sexes, all you have to do is assign offices and functions to two people of different sexes.

The lie that Italian feminists are interested in equality ends here, in the face of the fact that there is a win-win solution, which works quite well, and which the PD policies know for sure, but NEVER mention.

Italian newspapers are highlighting the fact that Baerbock's husband will stay home to support the family during the election campaign (Merkel's husband, who exists and has survived, has been doing the same thing for 16 years, but no newspaper he never mentioned), but no Italian newspaper (and even the Italian Wikipedia) mentions the fact that the German Greens have TWO leaders, and the same for SPD.

Which would solve their problem IF THEIR PROBLEM WERE EQUAL.

But that's not exactly how things are.

And lies have short legs.