The suspicious timing.

I do not have a great deal of sympathy for the inquiries of the magistrates nor for those of the journalists, as the readers of the blog will have noticed, but there is a way of discussing the inquiries that makes me laugh a lot. It makes me laugh a lot when you hear about "suspicious timing", as Meloni does now.

Let's try to understand each other. Newspapers are (also) companies. And they have to break the news when

1. people see them
2. when they matter to people
3. when people are more interested in deepening them.

this is normal: there is no three in the morning news, but there is one in the evening. And that's because at three in the morning there are fewer people in front of the TV.

Good.

Likewise, I notice a suspicious timing: restaurants are open when people are most hungry. Noon, dinner time: is there not going to be behind a gobloddo against the poor hungry consumer? Isn't that a clickbait?

Um… no. Restaurants open their kitchens at lunchtime not because there is a conspiracy or because there are "suspicious timing". It's just that at that moment there are more people who have the time and hunger to come in and sit at the table.

I could perhaps make an exception for magistrates who apparently have no commercial intent. But now I get there.

But one thing is certain. If we talk about a company like Fanpage.it, which wants to have an impression with a journalistic scoop, it is obvious that a scoop against Meloni during the elections goes away like hotcakes. Maybe it wouldn't go away as well anytime soon.

So, no, there is no "suspicious timing": the newspaper publishes its investigation exactly when there are more people willing to see it, exactly like the restaurant opens at noon because people are hungry and it is pause. No "suspicious timing", at best I would speak of "excellent weather".

Let's talk about the investigation into Luca "Sissy" Morisi. (I've been calling him this for a long time, so I'd say avoid stupid comments: Morisi's habits are all too well known in the right channels, and for a long time. to the blog ( https://keinpfusch.net/voto-ai-16enni/ ) you can use twitter as a reference:

This investigation is not, in turn, accused of timing. First of all, as I said, he knew half of the Telegram about Morisi's sexual habits, it was known to anyone who frequents a little underground of the network, well before August (when the crime happened).

So wanting to cheat Morisi, he was an easy target: the "right" of Salvini's party knew it, and his henchmen spread the word left and right. I really don't think I was the first to know, so you can backdate the evidence yet that I did.

But the crime happened in August, and nothing was known. Only now the newspapers (which have their moles in the prosecution) have decided to publish the story. But I repeat, the times are those of newspapers, which being companies put the product on the market when there is more demand.

So, it's time the politicians stopped coming up with "timing". Newspapers are companies, and they publish stuff when demand is highest. If Salvini, for example, had dated a very gifted Brazilian black transsexual who often works in Milan, so to speak, we would not have known it 2 years ago, but exactly now.

So please give the perfect timing story a break. All commercial activities have times.

And they are those in demand.