“A mother knows certain things”
I happened to go through the Italian news concerning the Bianchi brothers, who kicked and punched poor Willy. And I was struck, at a certain point, by a part of the article with which a person believes to attribute powers of infallibility for the mere fact of having a functioning uterus, at least until a few years before.
It is about this:
Now, the first question that comes to mind is: but why should "a mother" know better than anyone else? Because not only does this person "know" as a "mother", but it extends to a whole gang of people, "them", and therefore this power seems to enjoy extravagant reflective properties.
One also wonders why we do not put "mothers" to investigate, given that they seem to enjoy the possibility of "knowing" who the culprit is, and the answer is that apparently "a mother" can "know" , by virtue of her own proven functional uterus, only someone's innocence, and only if the offspring is involved.
And before the usual feminists start screaming, I would like to point out that these mothers who "know certain things" ALSO appear in cases of rape: see under "Mamma Grillo".
After all, this thing is not only Italian: in the ciatti murder, the Chechens showed up in the classroom with the mothers, to certify that they are good guys, despite the videos saying the opposite, and also in the Spanish case it turned out. that they, as mothers, know very well that their children are innocent.
This mom superpower thing has deep roots. But these powers of omniscence to mothers seem to be stronger the more the society is backward and patriarchal (for once in a while) and coincidentally it is one of the bastions that our homegrown feminists always decide to ignore.
The mother as a superwoman is a serious problem for the feminist culture: on the one hand the TERF identify the woman with her body, while they say that the woman is not just a body, and coincidentally they say that if you do not have a menstrual cycle , you cannot have children and you do not have TWO X chromosomes, then you are not a woman. (*)
On the other hand, it is a constant of patriarchal culture: women spend their time being completely secondary shit to intelligent life on the planet, until they are PROMOTED by motherhood.
As soon as a woman becomes pregnant, and all the more reason she becomes a mother, she goes from "woman" to "woman ++". Which is not a programming language, but a state in which they take their revenge. With the result that it almost seems sensible to say "certain things a mother knows".
- Theorem: Given a real function to a real variable that is continuous and derivable in a certain interval I, if x0 is a maximum (minimum) point then the first derivative in x0 is zero.
- Demonstration: "a mother knows certain things".
- QED.
Obviously, women ++ are very proud of this status: for the first time in their life, thanks to the magical power of the uterus, they experience the wonderful sensation that is felt in being considered human beings.
Indeed, even more so, from the moment they are mothers you begin to notice the phenomenon of mothersplaining: they literally become experts in everything, absolutely everything, and begin to explain to you aspects of your work that you did not suspect at all. Did you know, for example, that the linux kernel must be breastfed for at least three months after compiling it? No? You are men, you don't understand shit. A mother feels certain things. You wouldn't even know how to change diapers on an HP DL380 server, you wouldn't know.
Obviously, sooner or later this status of "mother", or "woman ++", sooner or later is destined to end, although women ++ are managing to propagate it indefinitely.
- the boys leave home much later. Consequently, the role of "woman ++" or "mother" lasts much longer. Before, when the last child arrived at the military postcard, the ++ woman returned to being a normal woman, indeed, one of poor quality as she ended up in the "old" or even downgraded "mother-in-law" category. This new habit of big babies has extended the period of omnipotence by now even about twenty years.
- no, the fact that they are professional fighters, and maybe they go around killing people with kicks and punches does NOT get them out of mom's orbit. Whether he invaded Poland or not, Adolf Hitler always remains a very sweet child: believe me, a mother knows certain things: bad companies have ruined him.
- just questioning for a moment the power and worth of a woman ++ is immoral, blasphemous and could cause serious consequences throughout the universe. Having a functioning uterus, it seems, is an insurmountable status, to the point that if you are a woman and they hear you say you don't want children, they treat you like someone who doesn't stoop to pick up a diamond seen on the street: "what would it be like to say, that you are not interested in the status of a woman ++, the only female stage considered dignified? You don't want to live your whole life like a simple woman, do you? ".
behold, that a woman goes around crowded places using a large stroller when the Kennedy aircraft carrier (but using it as an ice pick), three times out of four without a child inside (but it is convenient for shopping), or who pretends to explain neutrinos to CERN scientists (like mom she knows certain things, especially for a particle that ends in "ino", a small thing that therefore falls within the competence of women. The neutrino must burp, otherwise it does not sleep well), you must not put doubt that she, having a demonstrably functioning uterus, is literally omniscient.
Even when he's a blatant dickhead, ignorant as a goat. What matters is the functioning uterus.
But the woman, we are told, is not just her womb. Except when it is.
(*) actually in higher mammals one of the two X chromosomes is inactivated, so no woman really has TWO X chromosomes.