Italy towards the most rigged elections in history.
I don't know if you've ever seen a rigged boxing match. On youtube you will find several. When the betting round decides a winner, or more precisely decides a victory, that I know, in the fourth round, you see that for the first three rounds the two do not touch. They give themselves the typical fists of a well-mannered lady, they are avoided, just to avoid throwing down the opponent and disturbing the already established result.
An example, outside of boxing, can be found in these Italian elections, and to see it, just look at how the contenders behave, that is, the fact that they don't really hit each other, they don't really hurt each other.
Let's take for example Salvini's "I believe". Obviously it is a reference to alleged Catholic Christian values, but the question that arises spontaneously is: why does no one go on TV to remind him that
- Rubbing on a cubist in a thong in a Rimini dance hall is not one of the Catholic retreats.
- Rimini is not mentioned among the places of the Gospel
- Even if wine is used in mass, the Mojito has no Eucharistic value.
it doesn't take much to shame salvini's "faith": it could be said that basing his campaign on an alleged Catholicism "he is looking for it", he is like a boxer who is in the ring and keeps his hands in his pockets. Not the best guard, here.
Strangely, no one points out to him that with two divorces on his shoulders, Eucharistic Mojiti, Cubist Maddalene in thongs and "her lifestyle", this is not exactly what we expect as a Catholic leader.
The same goes for "Christian woman" Giorgia Meloni: someone could also tell him that:
- living together is not marriage. Christianity does not look favorably on "living together without marrying".
- for that matter, he doesn't even look favorably on "having children without getting married".
- His naval blockade would not pass to the consultation because it is a deliberate act of war, and the Italian constitution prohibits it.
Turning to "moderate" Berlusconi, here we are shooting at the red cross. Berlusconi "popular", and 'to say the billionaire worker, does not even make sense. Wanting to sink it, as soon as it opens its mouth you sink it: one wonders why the family still allows this decrepit old man to go on TV to be laughed at, or to be photographed with so many filters that now Emma Watson's deep fake porn it seems taken from the Bible.
Let's face it: if someone got into the ring determined to throw real punches, they would have really easy opponents to beat.
We want to talk about Adinolfi who, after the divorce, gets married in that symbolic place of Christianity that is Las Vegas, inside that temple of faith that is the Casino? And do we want to talk about the holiness inherent in the spiritual practice of the game of Poker? Don't you know that all those young ladies you see in casinos in Las Vegas are only undressed because it's hot, and they call themselves Escorts because they're cheering on Ford?
There is such a pile of scoundrels that a determined opponent, with a minimum of sarcasm, could crumble them.
Instead, they get into the ring, put their fists in their pockets and start their tough election campaign: “naughty”, “bad boy”, “no good”, “incoherent”. The best they say.
I am amazed that there is a need to prove that the game is rigged and that competition is non-existent.
Let me be clear, I have nothing against the lifestyles of those politicians, per se: the fact is that if you then paint them as "Christianity", in a REAL competition you are massacred.
I'm sorry, but you have to be an idiot for not having understood that there is no electoral competition, and that the game is over. A good journalist would be enough to debunk the "Christianity" of Salvini and Meloni, or the "moderation" of the Berlusconians.
But the question is: if the bets are made and the games are decided, who is the bettor, and who is dealing the cards?
We can get there using a little bit of reasoning. Surely it is something that works behind the scenes, and it cannot be Italian because the sum of the Italian occult powers at most will be as large as the country itself, so it cannot overwhelm it.
But these bettors have to do one thing: stay behind the scenes. It is therefore necessary to look for an oddity, something that should be talked about a lot, and instead we talk very little.
By the way: you know everything about the fact that the PD has embarked on questionable characters of the greens and the extreme left, you know that Calenda and Renzi have merged into the third pole, you know that Cirinna 'is not a candidate, but… why? Well, because if the Italian knows these things, he is an informed voter who will therefore be able to participate in politics in a positive sense.
And so I ask you a question: do you know, at the same level of detail, European politics? Do you know who is in government in Brussels? And with which parties?
The truth is that the media coverage of Brussels politics is so poor and limited that in fact the EU is the only power – practically hidden, in the sense of secrecy.
If we think that political information is necessary for the citizen, through the vote, to exercise control over what the government does, well, the EU has no control for the simple reason that it does NOT have any coverage from the Italian press.
We know why Letta said that Meloni's and Salvini's parties voted against the PNRR. We only know why Calenda said that in the European Parliament Berlusconi is not allied with Salvini and Meloni, but with Letta, the political area of Calenda and the Greens.
Except that Calenda forgets that he broke up with Letta because he put the greens among the allies. Maybe I'm wrong in the political area, but then I would like to know in which group Calenda is seen, since he has not yet said it. The liberals, one would guess, but then in Europe he is allied with the Greens and with Letta. And with Berlusconi.
But the point is that by doing so, the EU becomes an occult power, in the sense of secrecy: not the fault of the EU, mind you. They spend huge sums to put everything online and have a social presence, to the point that even an instance of the fediverse has opened up.
But Italian journalism ignores them, and relegates them to the "foreign" section. And even when he dedicates a crumb of space to him, he interviews strictly Italian politicians already known to the political public.
Without press coverage there is obviously no control and all you know is that Lagarde controls the ECB and then there's Ursula. On the rest, when compared with the politics of Rome, very little is known.
It is as if in Italy they did a small report, every two months, on the head of the government, and one every six months on the president of the Bank of Italy. The rest, everything and only on your region. What would you understand of Italian politics?
And even on the ballots it is no better, the Italian parties (but also the foreign ones, eh) do not devote much space to the symbol of the coalition to which they belong: you do not see the name of the European parties such as PPE, etc.
You can find them here, if you are curious:
for the record, apparently, Renzi and Calenda would be with Renew Europe.
This is the reason why they don't beat each other like they should. Because in the end the real power is in Brussels, and these provincial shows that are national elections only serve to mesmerize the public.
Otherwise, they would not have the courage to define "champions of Christianity" of the characters who look like tavern number five.