Red-brown skirts.
We are starting to notice a phenomenon that has actually existed at least since the time of Franco Freda, who with his Nazi-Maoists had effectively invented a new genre. After all, both red and black extremism have more things in common than differences, so it was enough to write a couple of books where this small gap was closed, and we had a compact formation.
If we look at what the reds and browns had in common, we see that there are many things, from hatred towards democracy to contempt for individual freedom, which both consider a form of decadence, and especially from the precedence given to the group , with respect to the person, and a certain myth of the heroes fallen against the enemy, as well as a certain victimism.
With what the extremists of the right and the left have in common, a consistent "political" program is already being created. And therefore it is enough to make a party.
This definition of red-brown shirts remained muted for many years, but is now exploding again with the formation of political movements, in Italy we have begun to notice people like Fusaro, in Germany a personal red-brown party is now about to be born behind the former "red ” Sarah Wagenknecht, and in Italy then the rossobruni of Alemanno and Marco Rizzo.
But if we exclude Sarah Wagenknecht, and look at the rossobruni, we can immediately ask ourselves a question: are they all men? Freda, Alessandro Battista, Fusaro, and all the other rossobruni are almost always male.
But it's hard to believe. Women make up 50% of the population, so if red-brown shirts exist, red-brown shirts must also exist. And then the second question begins: if red-brown skirts existed, would we notice? And how?
We must therefore look for a women's movement that has the same program as the rossobruni: overthrowing the rule of law, imposing a certain level of collectivism, annihilating the individual as a subject.
There is a gigantic movement that does it, that is doing it before our eyes and that we are underestimating for one simple reason.
This time the fascists are sending their women forward.
Let's take for example one of the watchwords of modern Italian feminists:
This is a real demolition of the rule of law. Because Murgia is clearly wrong. Who says that? The Constitution.
just go to the senate website and look for article 27 of the constitution:
https://www.senato.it/associazione/la-costruttura/parte-i/titolo-i/article-27
So yes, Murgia was dead wrong and had written blatant red-brown bullshit because EVERYONE, and I repeat EVERYONE, is only accountable for themselves ("criminal responsibility is personal"), and because EVERYONE, and I repeat EVERYONE, they are INNOCENT if a FINAL conviction has not yet been issued. We need a court.
Murgia's is a very violent attack on the Italian Constitution: if these principles were written in the Constitution, you would obtain a state in which you can be put in prison for something that you did NOT do, a state in which you do not need a court to punish you: they arrive the red and brown skirts at your house and they will kill you, because some Filippo has killed some Giulia on the other side of the country.
Michela Murgia, being a writer, does not have the possibility of saying that she has been misunderstood or that her words must be read in some context: she has a perfect command of the language, and if she says something, it is evidently what she wanted to say . And with these words, he wanted to demolish two fundamental pillars of the rule of law.
Why do we struggle to do this?
For two reasons:
- We are not used to counting women among fascist intellectuals.
- Murgia identified herself, reciprocated, with the extreme left.
all these things, if we consider that we are looking for a movement that is not classic fascism, but a fusion of the common characteristics of Maoism and Nazism, should not mislead us.
In the introduction photo of the article I put some photos of the Hitler Youth, the women's section, some of which later became "Hitler's furies", arriving to fight on the field.
As you can see, for a woman of the period they were quite emancipated: the gymnastics uniform, in the period, would have led to prison any woman walking around the streets dressed like that, for being indecent, that is, dressed against German habits and customs. (*)
They slept outside alone, in a nation where it was the mothers' job to ensure that girls slept at home and alone, under penalty of prison. (the law was abolished only in 1967, however, even though no one was arrested for it anymore).
There is no doubt about the fact that the women of the Hitlerjugend were more emancipated than their fellow citizens, so it should not be surprising if a group of feminists have some problems in enlisting among the red and brown skirts. There were also the daughters of the she-wolf in Italy, but they tended to be insignificant slobs and never reached the phenomenon of "Hitler's Furies", and certainly did not go to fight at the front (in truth, not even the black shirts went there: in usually they arrived after the fact, even though the propaganda later said the opposite).
But the point I want to make is this:
neither the words about emancipation and equality, nor the fact that we talk about women should distract us: a fascist is a fascist even in a skirt, a fascist betrays himself as soon as he opens his mouth.
And Murgia opened her mouth wide.
The fact that the left identifies itself with the Murgia should be of little concern, because in reality the spaces for adherence between ideologies are very great.
For example:
They have the same logical structure. The second sentence was pronounced by Himmler during the oath of the SS he had re-founded, in Spandau.
And there are many points of convergence: instead of limiting ourselves to simple quotes, I can compare the feminist ideological manifesto and the Nazi one: I recommend you read these two books well:
The first is Mein Kampf (my battle), the second the so-called “SCUM manifesto for the elimination of the male, the book which in practice founds the feminist ideology. In addition to being practically identical, we can observe in both books a certain interest in the (eu)genetic discourse. Here is an excerpt from the feminist manifesto.
It shouldn't be surprising that they are women, that they talk about equality, that they cry about victimhood, that they identify with the far left: they take victimhood from fascism, equality from the right, it's a portmanteau, in reality the convergence between the two ideologies is evident when reading the two books.
The new idea of regime has acquired all the convenient traits of the extreme right and all those of the extreme left. Furthermore, from fascist and communist history they understood that it is more difficult for many to shoot a woman and stop their seizure of power.
They are the red-brown skirts.
(*) For this reason, in Germany the habits and customs, which are also a source of law in Italy, are not so in the case of the penal code. In short, to decide whether getting a blowjob in the park is obscene, Italian judges use existing customs as a parameter in criminal proceedings. In Germany it can't be done, so if you get a blowjob in a public park what they can do is fine you, but there are no criminal consequences. Criminal law CANNOT accept custom law, so they wouldn't be able to tell you whether it is against custom or not.