The Dudes Club
I'm answering here so I don't have to repeat the same answers over and over again. Yes, it's true, during a discussion the idea emerged of opening an exquisitely masculine place (Ah! Bullfighting!), to discuss exquisitely masculine issues, away from the politically correct rubbish who feels offended by everything . But also by psychopaths obsessed with "gomunis di ghe go white the madonna gon the dransexual lesbians of the gender".
The result is the Pleroma instance that you find on https://dudes.keinpfusch.net
It is an instance of the fediverse, and federa, however each user is configured as "followers only", meaning only those who follow you will see what you write.
But this is not the point.
The point (that is, the first thing I asked myself as a bartender moderator ) is how to keep a certain type of "male" out. What does it mean? It means that several movements that initially might have made sense because they complained about real problems have been invaded and colonized by elements of the alt-right. Becoming, in fact, fascist and violent small groups. But especially, becoming intellectually and culturally irrelevant.
Thus, since the main characteristic of the politics of these groups is obsession, the policy of the instance is inspired by take it easy, that is, dudeism.
(If you've never seen The Big Lebowski, okay, can you really call yourself a man? Is life worth living?)
You can find the policy here:
https://dudes.keinpfusch.net/about
and as you can see, it is founded on dudeism.
Let's go to the individual points. Why is it specified that it is not part of the "manosphere"?
It is not part of it because if initially the Anglo-Saxon "manosphere" discussed interesting problems, today I could summarize all the contents with a single sentence: "there are sluts, but not like women". The mockery of the "stupid TikTok of the day" is an example of this. If the pinnacle of intellectual depth is discovering that Tiktok wasn't born to be intelligent, but to be fun, honestly an AI will soon take your job away.
As if that weren't enough, in the manosphere the poverty of content is paired with the poverty of proposals.
I can understand that with current legislation, especially in the USA, marriage is a financial trap for men. But saying that you intend to stay single to go to the gym and to work harder and make more money (as Andrew Tate says) seems to me a lot like the “Epic War of the Norse Heroes for the right to se famo du' stringi. ”
Also because, as it must be said, the percentage of wives who forbid going to the gym and making money, in my opinion, tends towards zero.
- “Dear, I want to make a career and get rich”
- "But why'? I like living in a tent on the sidewalk and rummaging through garbage"
In my opinion it is not a very frequent dialogue in the USA.
- Dear, I would like to go to the gym, to be healthy and have my abs visible.
- But how disgusting! I like you flabby, sick and obese.
This too, in my opinion, happens very little.
So if your goal was to stay single for this reason, I think the effort isn't worth it. The MGTOW movement, if you look at very old discussions, aimed to give males the opportunity to evolve spiritually (for example, reading, attending university, having hobbies such as music or art, volunteering or to spirituality) freeing them from the nightmare of performance (physical and financial), but today you no longer find any trace of all this.
You have become a pile of idiots who stay alone so they can go to the gym and work even harder. To be a revolution let me tell you: both King Louis and the Tsar would have paid for revolutions like this.
The same thing goes for the hero of the moment, Andrew Tate. Said as it must be said, he is an idiot who has been covered in epic thanks to the fact that he himself paid a very corrupt Romanian magistrate for a persecution that is not a persecution, from which he will emerge unscathed because, as per the agreements, everything is done by an accusation that does not make accusations . He says he was in prison for two months, but he didn't get out like I expect someone to get out of a Romanian prison. And his story, today, is so blatantly inconsistent that I wouldn't even know where to begin to debunk it.
He says he fights "the matrix", suggesting the incredible idea that if you work hard you will earn more, and that business pays off. Interesting. Never heard before.
I can't understand, honestly, why this character is so important: he makes this sort of video where he "destroys feminists", as long as he chooses the absolutely stupid ones (it's not difficult to find them, mind you) who fight on a show where the referee/moderator sides with Tate. OOOOK. If you need the referee on your side to defeat those slobbers in pathetic arguments about applied common sense, the warrior that lived inside you has been getting the eviction years ago.
It doesn't convince me one bit. He just seems like a vulgar cocaine addict selling snake oil to me, sort of like a bodybuilder Alex Jones, surviving his own lifestyle because he's young and has time for the gym. Other than that, he seems like an idiot to me.
The history of RedPill has also been taken hostage. At the time it came out, it reflected an association that was serious at the time, and it dealt with serious men's problems, such as deaths at work, absolute poverty, suicide, homelessness, and all those things that mainly happen to males.
But today it has been colonized by the fascists, and all they can say is “ugly feminists! evil feminists!”. Which I might agree with, if it wasn't an obsession for these people.
An interesting thing was that at one time they also dealt with the problems, I don't know, of fathers. Because even when the birth rate is 1-odd per couple, in a men's movement I expect to hear a lot of issues related to fatherhood.
The problem is that all these male movements have been colonized by fascist movements whose leaders (and also many of the members) do not have children (if we exclude assault rifles), much less children – eugenically speaking, this is a bless – and therefore they "forgot the chapter", limiting themselves to generic complaints about the fact that the court always assigns the children to the mother. That's all? Do fatherhood problems end here? Strange, because even though I rarely discuss these issues, I have often heard the complaint "I'm married and live with my family, but work doesn't leave me time to spend with my children, except for the weekend". (to name one that comes to mind at the moment, but there are many others).
I'm not saying that the absence of parental issues is fundamental in my criticism, but it is a clear symptom: it is no longer ordinary men who are speaking, but a small group of young, troublesome ultras who don't have children, have never had them, and unless they commit rape they will never have any.
We can close the Red Pill issue by saying one thing: yes, that documentary said sensible things at a time when it interviewed a sensible movement made up of real men who lived outside the Internet. Today, that movement marches lined up and covered under the Southern flag and has more guns than shoes. If you find a sensible video of theirs it dates back at least two or three years ago.
Ah, right. Passports bro. Do you know those who try to hit on foreign women at the seaside because foreign women are easier, while their wives spread it on everyone like Nutella?
Here you are. Similarly, the Passport Bro has convinced himself that if he goes to other countries – typically poor ones – to look for a "traditional wife", he will have better luck.
Obviously on the other side there is the well-known and centuries-old phenomenon of human trafficking of poor wives, but they don't know it and believe that a Filipino wife is simpler than a local wife.
I repeat, they remind me of those who (in my youth) went to the Riviera to pick up anything blonde and badly shaved, despising Italian women who didn't have the right mentality. (according to them).
Obviously they didn't know they were rummaging through all the German white trash, but the point is that at the same time, very normal males who went there to have fun at the seaside with friends were having seventh grade Richter fucks, with a very normal (and very despised by the others ) girl from Lecce (shaved decently most of the time, as well as accustomed to the existence of the Bide').
At the entry “passport bro” I simply shed a pitiful veil. Truly. As a man, I wouldn't know where to start.
Does this mean I suddenly like feminists? No, because their complete ineffectiveness is now evident. A global movement like #metoo hasn't changed what happens in power relations one iota, it has led to the arrest of half a dozen famous big predators (in total), all concentrated in Hollywood, nothing more. It is not stopping the phenomenon of femicide, as I predicted, and as a movement that changes culture it is more annoying than dangerous.
Honestly, modern feminists just… I don't care. They are a useless and inconclusive movement. I wouldn't spend time on it. In fact, I don't spend any of it. And so I wouldn't want the club to become a complaint against those sloshes: if they hurt you, well, the muscles you need are spiritual.
In any case, since the most common psychological trait (both among feminists and among the Alt-Right) is the obsession with certain themes, obviously I used a "take it easy" rulebook, inspired by the Dude.
Since light-heartedness is the number one public danger for those suffering from obsessions , I consider the problem solved at its root.
Let's get to “how to join the club.”
So, there are two ways. The main way, if you have NOT already been in the Fediverse for years, is to meet someone in the club. You ask them to come in, and they ask the moderator (who in us is called "the bartender") to send you an invitation via email.
The second way, if you have been in the Fediverse for years, is to send a request to “@thedude@dudes.keinpfusch.net”, containing your email. The bartender will verify your account (the one from which you send the request) , will see who you follow, understand who you are, and decide whether to let you in or not. This, of course, requires that there be a lot of your own content on your account. An account opened yesterday with a few dozen reposts won't work.
I hope I have answered all the questions. Oh, no. One last thing.
The thing that shocks me the most are people who join a group without giving a damn about the rules. So, first, read the T&C page.
https://dudes.keinpfusch.net/about
Because you don't have to violate them to get kicked out: the certainty that you've never read them is enough for me, because if you happily don't give a damn about the rules of a group, you can't stay there.
Well, now I hope I've answered all the questions.