The holy Schlein
I find it incredible to make a post in which I underline how idiotic the voters of the Democratic Party are, who swallow any ocelot without saying a word, as long as it's cool and there are magic words like "woman", "lesbian", etc.
I have to write this post before Schlein starts walking on water, or multiplying bread and tofu, (because then it will be necessary for them to lose the next election before they stop swearing that it is enough for them to lay hands on the party because heal of all evil), so I will be brief..
Do you remember Renzi? It was the hope of change because it had two magic words: “young” and “new”. When the currents torpedoed Renzi, the party found itself in Letta's abyss. Abyss so boring they had the worst result in 10 million years.
So the party was desperate because people had pissed off, and they redid the same process that led to Renzi: you take two or three magic words, in this case "woman", "young", "lesbian", and one says “stop!, here is the woman of Providence who just because she exists will transform a party that was D”Alema's rectum and make it become the new and beautiful thing that we all want”.
Too bad then, punctually, immediately after the elections, the currents return and kill the secretary. And then they will start all over again: first they will put a foreskin (like Zingaretti, or like Letta) to manage the party, until the comrades have ingrown nails even on hemorrhoids from how disgusting they are.
When the party has sucked enough and something new is needed, they will take the two cool words of the moment (say, “black”, “farsighted”, and “transsexual”) and paf, here is the new secretary of the PD who will solve ' all because he is black, farsighted and transgender. And go, another round.
I even find it embarrassing how easily they fall for it. Always. They always fall for it.
It's incredibly stupid to note how PD followers ALWAYS fall for it. How many times have currents avoided dealing with voters in this way? I count at least 7.
- Matteo Renzi , {young, wrecker, modern}
- PierLuigi Bersani , {cows in the corridors, turkeys on the roofs, chickens in the living room}
- Francesco Rutelli, {piacione, semi-young, mayor}
- D'Alema , {intelligent, intelliggentisssssimo, demiblair}
- Romano Prodi , {europa, mortadella, se non prodi non godi}
- Walter Weltroni , {pseudo-intellectual, pseudo-Catholic, pseudo-saint}
- Rodota' {intelligent, impartial, immobile}
- Achille Occhetto , {let's save our asses, communism has collapsed, I'll take care of it}
Obviously many have made more than one turn in the presidency, but the fact that they still haven't understood that the latest news of the moment doesn't change shit, and that in any case the party will engulf the secretary immediately after the elections, makes me very perplexing.
All of these candidates have one thing in common, and that is magical thinking.
The first thing that strikes you is above all a fetishism towards symbols: Berlusconi as a symbol had, so to speak, Berlusconi's face. And as an anthem, thank goodness Silvio is there. The left has gone through an extravagant botanical fetishism, with oaks, olive trees, daisies, carnations, and I don't know what else.
As if that weren't enough, magical rituals abound. There is no doubt that a "round dance" around the public prosecutor's office to defend the magistrates is a magical ritual, just as the procession is a magical ritual (then if you want you can call it a demonstration, but anyhow: a procession for a saint), and an extravagant value given to words, which would otherwise have no meaning, such as "reformist".
And it is not for nothing that the very harsh opposition, which has already begun, consists in shouting magic words, which are supposed to have effects: "resignation" is a little Harry Potter's Expelliarmus, only that Harry Potter knew how to do it , and coincidentally all male gender weapons. (-us) . It is not clear why it works with magic wands, given that ferŭla , virga and virgula, or perhaps “baclitta” (Vulgar Latin) are clearly feminine. Maybe it is translated as or Bacculus? Or Rowling in Latin was a saw.
In short, they shout “resignation!” and expect it to happen. If this isn't magical thinking…
What does Schlein believe in? It is described as radical, so we would expect a traditional left, socialist if not communist, at any rate something European.
But no, in the sense that it is defined as radical in the AMERICAN sense of the term. So, in addition to smashing the wallera with intersectional feminism and intersectionism in general, he'll deal with sixty genders (*). The problem with intersectionism is that it doesn't question disparities.
If you tell Schlein that only 2% of S&P 500 CEOs are women, she will tell you that this must be fought until women are 50%. But the problem of a European socialist is not counting pussies and peas, the problem is that those companies own most of the WORLD's resources.
This difference of vision means that when Schlein says she fights inequalities, Europeans dream of a division between social classes, where one takes away from the rich to redistribute to the poor, while Schlein takes care of taking away from men to redistribute to women, to take from the whites to give to the blacks, etc.
The fact that the rich all have more or less the same social and economic privileges and the poor all have the same social and economic problems, regardless of skin or gender, does not touch it. Consequently, as soon as it becomes clear what means to be "Radical" in the sense of Schlein, ie American, will melt like snow in the sun.
What do I expect?
- For a few more months, in pure opposition, Schlein will continue to ask for the resignation of so and so, to heal the sick, to walk on water and towards beatification.
- Meanwhile, he will promote cancel culture to such levels that the population will begin to dislike Mussolini's liberalism.
- The sycophants of the Democratic Party will become so unbearable, know-it-all, annoying and feminist that no one in their right mind will vote for them in the next European elections. But being today at an all-time low, perhaps they can boast that with Santa Schlein they are catching up.
- In the next policies, the stick will bring everyone back down to earth.
- The next leopard will arrive and only because it exists has already saved the Democratic Party.
And they'll have another one, as usual.
(*) If you talk to me about gender in a social sense, I might even agree. But to claim, as the American Wokes do, that there are more than two biological sexes is simply absurd. There are two cells in reproduction: ova and sperm. One sex produces ova and one produces sperm: if you want to introduce another biological sex, you have to get me a third cell involved. Which doesn't exist.