The rapes and the Cagnara Project
In addition to a series of very clear distortions, the story of the rapes (which could also be a political problem, if it were) produced a furious revup in the Cagnara Project engine. And we can see it in the main Italian newspapers, which today have a new task: to depress.
Why did I write that the gang rape issue could be a political issue, if it were? Because honestly, in the last two glaring cases, there are two areas of the country that are out of control, both socially and in the sense of military control of the territory.
They don't look like "Italy", or "Europe", but for that matter they don't even look like "2023". There are therefore all the characteristics to represent political problems: if we represented the state of the relationship between state and crime as we represent the Russia-Ukraine war, what we would see is "crime takes Caivano", or "Crime Troops" now control Vucciria”, as is done with the ongoing war in the east.
And in that case one thing would appear clear: in terms of means, the state is giving much more to Kiev than to justice and the interior ministry. Since in political terms the loss of territory by the state is awkward to represent, we are careful not to do so. And it goes to the racket.
So, I was saying, these two rapes will show us one thing: that 120 howitzers are donated to Kiev to retake its cities, while in the places in question there is barely a police station.
But the real question is: why is the Cagnara Project, which was created to defend an inept ruling class, as long as it does not get involved in income policy, deal with this matter?
The point is that we need to clearly describe which form Italian society is moving towards, and if we look at the economic data, we discover that already today the social and economic form is landlord feudalism.
What we now call "financiers", or "industrialists", or in some ways entrepreneurs, are nothing more than the landowning classes of that period, and the "modern" state is leaning towards becoming that of the lower Gothic period, simply failing to do everything that distinguishes it from a feudal system.
The Cagnara Project, therefore, aims in the short term to prevent the government from starting to do "modern" things, such as territorial control or an incomes policy, or a justice system that works, but has the long-term objective of feudal landowner-type society, i.e. based on a (low) income from already existing positions.
The world of business, industry, and even finance in Italy have a very low turnover rate, a catastrophically high average age, and to make matters worse the names (if sorted by families) are the same.
That said, now we can talk about what the cagnara project doesn't want to say.
The first question concerns the first rape, that of Palermo.
Let us ask ourselves: what would have happened to the raped girl in the period of landlord feudalism?
Well, we know about her that she doesn't have a powerful family, in fact she doesn't have one at all. And that young rapists come from more respected families. The truth is that, in the world of landlord feudalism, the girl faced a fate of prostitution, that is, as soon as some charitable institution released her into society, she had two choices. The prostitute or the nun. In both cases, the violence of an unwanted sexuality, or of an unwanted homosexuality in the case of the nuns.
Even if she had become a humble maid on some farm, however, she would have been raped by the children of good families, alone or in groups, sooner or later. It was part of the contract at the time.
Even if we go to the other case, to Caivano, we have to ask ourselves how things were going in that historical period. Trouble is, it doesn't change much. It would have been a country-contraccia, inhabited mainly by those who defined themselves as "men of hard work", and by "women of a certain make". In short, it was quite normal for the children of the lucky ones to go to those places and (for a minimal fee) have fun with the local girls. At that time, especially when men were at work, local women were simply prey. At any age. They would have been used in much the same way by some well-born young man from outside the neighborhood.
But to find this you don't need to go back to the Middle Ages. You can also find mentions of it in The Leopard, and dozens of other "veristic" books: we are talking about the last Bourbon period.
Treating these phenomena as new, or as new trends, makes no sense. They don't come from the future, but from the past. In very similar places, similar things have always happened, such as the sale of little girls, the introduction of prostitution and hunting in the streets.
The only exception, at the time, was represented by those young people who had escaped, becoming priests (and being abused by the church) or becoming nuns (ditto).
It's not about new things that come through new phenomena such as online pornography: it's about a feudal landowner social structure, which has survived since the Bourbon period. They are, in fact, Indian reservations where, apart from the aesthetics of modernity, the company has remained that Bourbon landowner feudalism of the early 1800s.
It is therefore useless to ask whether it is the Internet or social networks or pornography: if anything, social networks and the Internet have made it possible to KNOW what was happening in those places. In short, the aesthetics of modernity doesn't mind its own business. Otherwise these rapes would not have become visible.
It's an old thing, dating back at least two centuries. And it still survives in some Jurassik Park. Towns, hamlets, neighborhoods.
If you observe the Cagnara Project, however, you will immediately notice that it is concentrating on showing the public completely irrelevant things, such as the photos of tizio and caio, or messages on social networks, but hardly anyone is, for example, going to interview people in that zone.
The problem of the advance of the Bourbon feudal society, that is, is not being taken into consideration. How come?
The reason is that, let's say it as it should be said, Italian newspapers are managed by a certain tribe of people, who have always lost out with modernity. And now he wants to close the account.
If you want to know which society the various large Italian newspapers are aiming at, online and off, you will find nothing else than that form of feudalism, where the most respected "families" made their pigs comfortable on the poorest population, and this concerned BOTH underpaid work and the poorest women's bodies.
No need to invent anything, the infection is still there, just use what's there and make it normal. I read in some newspapers that the Calabrian mafiosi say "Calabria exists, and what is not Calabria yet".
But this is not the only Calabrian mafiosi think. The rich financiers who own the big Italian newspapers think so. The usual Italian tribes, that 20% who own 70% of the country's assets. The same ones who also own the newspapers.
And since they now possess all assets, all that is left for them to plunder are the BODIES of the less rich and powerful. But to do that, they have to create the right society. These rapes, to them, are music.
They need a section of society so subhuman as to be inhabited by pigs without a conscience. Who will sell themselves for two pennies at work, and will sell their women for the convenience of pigs. They don't want prostitutes: they want servants to abuse . Sex is not enough for them, they want sex seasoned with power.
This project, mind you, is not perfect. It has weaknesses, which the Cagnara project presents as the country's major problems.
- The migration of skills.
- The demographic decline.
- Immigration.
It used to be called "brain drain", but now that companies are struggling to find staff, it is clear that the name should have been "skills migration". This is rapidly reducing the park/servants it takes for certain social classes to live like the rich. You can have all the villas you want, but without plumbers you're screwed.
Demographic decline is worrying for these classes, because it takes away from them the fresh meat they need, both male and female. Fewer servants to exploit, fewer girls to abuse.
Immigrants. They are a problem because on the one hand they are not competent enough to supply the need for slaves, but on the other hand when you put them into a feudal system of that kind, they tend to create closed tribes, which do not easily bend to their masters .
In short, Islamic girls lend themselves little to being flesh, when they do it is only towards other compatriots. If you touch a Ghanaian girl or a Nigerian girl, you risk being cut into slices with a machete.
The difficult part of immigration, from the point of view of the new overlords, is that these immigrants bow to crime, but not to their own wretched power. They are not in the drawing.
In short, if there really was this hunger for immigrants in companies, we would hear talk of "training": if you need people, and those arriving in Italy are low-skilled, all you have to do is train them. But this is not the plan of the new feudal lords. For them, people are just a large estate to be exploited with minimal investment.
Ultimately, all this racket is only for one thing. To hide a project, a cultural change that aims to take Italy back at least two hundred years.
And everything you'll see in the papers is just what it takes to hide it from you.