Vaccines and continental blockade.

Some time ago I wrote that Europe is subject to a continental blockade, a widespread practice among the thalassocracies (UK and USA in particular) in order to weaken the European continent. When I said it I was given the paranoid, after all the Pfizer vaccine is produced in Europe (but only that of the European plants) and that of AstraZeneca instead seems… and instead it is not.

Because as soon as J&J got the vaccine approved, he made it clear that he won't be able to comply with the booking agreement. And we are three out of three.

In practice, while the EU is being asked to allow vaccines produced in Europe to be exported, the British have blocked any export of vaccines (there are no customs documents showing export of vaccines to the EU) and the Americans too , (so forget that Biden is different from Trump: "America First" is still there, alive and well).

But when it is the EU that closes the borders, then the UK and Australia (always two pieces of the anglosphere) immediately rise up. In reality it is well known that AstraZeneca is not selling the vaccines in the EU at all: it is accumulating them in a warehouse in Belgium, waiting for the blockade to end. (do you know what a rip-off if the vaccine was considered dangerous?).

In any case, the point is simple: the US and the UK are blocking all exports, but are demanding from Brussels that European factories export. As governments block exports and will continue to do so until their problems have been solved, J&J cannot promise vaccines until the problem is solved in the US and UK.

At the same time, thunder and lightning occur if the EU blocks exports.

Faced with these known facts, the Anglo-Saxon sommeliers arrive who explain to us, from the Republic, that "the whole problem comes from contracts". Aha. And why if the EU does what they do, that is, they block exports, then thunder and lightning arise? Is it a problem of contracts?

After all, as the EU explained to the B-Dolf in Vienna when it decided to do its own thing, every country is free to buy vaccines from other sources, if it wants to shine. If you really believe that better contracts can be made, this is the right time to shine.

But nobody does.

There's just one little problem. "Small".

Meanwhile, people in the EU are dying by the thousands a day.

Now, I don't know about you, but I have severe prejudices towards nations that kill 30, 40,000 citizens of me. Because wars have been waged for much less in the past.

I know very well that a war is impossible, but at least it is expected that these nations will no longer be called "allies" or "friends". What is the point of going and sitting at a NATO table with an enemy nation that killed you tens of thousands of citizens with a continental blockade?

Who should have faith in an EU that cannot distinguish a friend from an enemy even when you have it in front of you and it slaughters you citizens?

But this is not just an EU problem. The problem is that even the nation states continue to ignore that the cause of the problem is a CLEAR continental blockade by the UK and the US. The press does not write it. Governments don't talk about it. Everywhere. In the name of an "Atlanticism" which today is only a tool that benefits the USA and the UK.

How does Biden intend to convince the EU to engage in a new cold war, when at the end of the day the UK and the US are the countries that are enacting an act of war like the continental vaccine blockade?

But after all, what have China and Russia done to us, exactly, compared to the massacre that this blockade policy is doing?

I read around that the usual popular front in Judea accuses the companies of causing this blockade. Interesting: companies that work NOT to sell? I'm sorry. Even if it were true that they sell to the highest bidder, it should be possible to negotiate purchase contracts at a higher price. But it isn't.

But ok, let's try to think that it's the companies. Let's say that Pascal Soriot, CEO of AstraZeneca, is the evil culprit. What does it take before a request for arrest is made on suspicion of causing the deaths of tens of thousands of people? For much less are there people who in Nuremberg were hanged, or imprisoned in Dachau until death.

Do you really think there is a cartel of companies blocking EU deliveries to get better prices? Ok. So let me see that if the EU offers more, they will sell it to us.

But suppose this is not proof, then the problem is: we are facing a criminal cartel (causing the death of tens of thousands of people is a crime, to my knowledge), maybe there is no space in the courtrooms, or in the jails?

The press is sending around films that accuse these and those of cowardice because they do not "cancel the patents" (something that had to be done months and months ago, if you wanted to solve the problem), but I don't see heroes, among the journalists, who ask to open a Nuremberg for these characters. Still, the monstrous crimes are there.

If we look at how far the vaccination plan has slipped, and we see that a third wave is coming, and we see that at least the population at risk should have been vaccinated FOR TODAY, we can attribute at least 500,000 deaths to this continental block. .

It seems to me that there is a Nuremberg.

But European governments, like newspapers, and all the finance behind them, seem too cowardly to tell.

I repeat: who can really trust these "atlantist" people at any cost?

Who can trust people who believe they are in the 1980s, when the UK and the USA were the countries that seemed to be the axis of good, and still haven't understood who these "allies" really are?

Do they really think they justify themselves with the fact that in order to "take Trump's power" then we must let the US finish vaccinating the population first? At the cost of hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of Europeans? Seriously?

The European parliament has not yet ratified the Brexit agreement. And I will be curious to see with what justification they will do it, given the criminal attitude of the counterpart. Will they really still trust the London butcher?

Let us then consider another fact. AstraZeneca's vaccine is having effects never measured in the UK. Denmark has blocked its administration due to some problems, even in Italy there are open investigations, and several countries are doubting it. In the UK, however, everything seems to have gone well, yet they have vaccinated many more people.

One wonders which of the two:

• did they use a different vaccine in the UK?
• is the UK government hiding the Oxford vaccine problems?

And in both cases: do we really want to continue to call these characters "allies"?