Vatican?

I am amazed at the amazement with which everyone takes the pope's stance on the Zan decree head on. For several reasons. The first is that the Vatican has a long history of meddling, and the second is that the Vatican has a long list of different mediating techniques.

The most pathetic thing I hear is that "I did not expect this from the church of Francis": the rumor has spread, without any supporting evidence, according to which the current pope is almost "on the left", " open ”,“ modern ”.

The first thing about this rumor is that it was built almost artfully for the Italian public: the myth of a "left" church serves to support the catastrophic chimera called "PD", where Catholics and leftists can graze on the same meadow. If the church showed itself in the Italian media for how it really thinks, it would get an out-out, "either with the church or with the left", and the PD would split, leaving only that faint smell of sodomized olive tree that you get if Vlad Tepes meets Romano Prodi on the street, and Prodi contradicts him.

But the church does not exist in a single country, and here a roundup is a must. We are talking about Poland, where the same church has been spreading anti-Semitic and homophobic hatred for years, to the point of obtaining inhuman laws on abortion, which prohibit it even if the mother risks her life, has been raped or is a victim of incest. All this is possible because the Catholic Church has actively participated in one of the most monstrous and medieval hate campaigns in human history.

At this point, the question is legitimate: is Italy's "good" pope the same criminal Nazi as Poland?

Obviously yes: the church has only one head.

But there is no trace of all this goodness of Franceso even in Germany: since here the Catholic church loses faithful like a sieve, and the faithful go to the evangelical church, the problem of the "open and modern" church has never worked because it does not it resists the "zero elevation" fire of evangelical newspapers.

While the Italian press would say that the pope is open on the issue of homosexuality even while at the CEI party he cooks lesbians on the barbecue, the evangelicals have a part of the press on their side, and when there is a problem they shoot high zero. Not for nothing do I know what happened in Poland and how we got to the brink of fascism thanks to the Catholic Church, while no newspaper has told you.

Fedez in Italy will struggle very much to find newspaper articles on Italian pedophile priests, because a domesticated press simply does not report them: it would take an "opposing" press that does not exist, to know their misdeeds.

And so we repeat the question:

"Does the Good Pope of the Italian press run the same church that has transformed, with clerical propaganda, Poland into a xenophobic, homophobic, gynophobic and essentially Nazi state?"

Yes, it's the same church.

This is the point that drops their narrative: their real behavior on the pitch.

In Italy, everyone will be quick to tell me that the Catholic Church has argued with Trump about migrants, but no one, evidently, is noticing the almost total support of the American Catholic Church for the Trump party and his ideas.

“The Good Pope of the Italian press runs the same church that shamelessly supports Trump's party, which goes on TV to say not to give communion to Biden, who preaches the right to have weapons at home, who speaks out against Mexican migrants? "

Yeah, it's the same church.

But now all the Jesuits will come out saying that the church is divided, that it is complex, that it is large, and therefore we must look at the pope and not at what his faithful, his priests and his bishops are doing. As if to say "Hitler never killed anyone, he loved dogs and was a vegetarian, so he had no faults." Uhm. Does not work.

In the past I have always used a principle to judge principles and parties: the shit flies theorem.

Shit flies are those iridescent flies that you always find on cow shit or horse shit. Now, imagine you see so many flies on a lump that you don't know what's underneath. It takes a lot of effort to understand that under a lump of shit flies, the thing that attracts them there can only be shit?

Obviously not.

So let's do a little bit of analogies. The Traini on duty arrives and shoots at some black dudes. Where do we find it? In a meeting of the PD? In a Boldrini conference? No, we find him in the League.

And if the shit fly goes there, the shit is there.

Now, some Jesuits have done something very interesting: they put a cherry on a shit cake, saying "look what a beautiful icing, it must be a beautiful cake". But if we then see all the shit flies on this "cake", the icing doesn't seem very believable. So we can simply ask ourselves "where are the shit flies going today?"

• in the USA, the fascist community continues to invoke "God", and the Catholic hierarchies, up to the provincial priest, hang on Trump's side. In every battle against women's rights, Catholic priests appear on TV. Shit flies ALWAYS go to shit.
• in Poland, every group of fascists known for beatings against Jews and homosexuals, as well as women protesting against the laws, proclaims (without being denied) a member of some Catholic group, has the public support of Catholic priests and bishops. Shit flies ALWAYS go to shit.
• in France, the worst of the worst on the national front does nothing but appeal to the Christian values ​​of France, to the applause of priests, bishops and various Catholics. Le Pen's own sister is a church lady. Shit flies ALWAYS go to shit.

in general, wherever you find violent fascistame, you will find a priest who defends them, a church that welcomes them, and often finances them. Shit flies ALWAYS go to shit.

In this panorama, the source of violent fascisms is absolutely clear: just look at the flies to find the shit.

Let's go to the interference: everyone is marveling at this action, as if there were not a sect of Catholic extremist fanatics who colonized the health care of different regions, producing 12,000 deaths during the first Covid infection, which sect is literally sabotaging the decisions of the state by placing its "saboteurs" as "conscientious objectors". (in a marital status, the Beamter is given a list of his duties at the time of hiring, and if he does not want to do those things he loses his job and privileges, even getting a bad bewerbung to present to the next employer, and if he has of conscience problems exists beer).

Therefore it cannot be said that the Vatican has ever stopped ingesting with Italian politics: it simply conducts "proxy war" against the decisions of the state, infiltrating its saboteurs in institutions, such as the pharmacists or doctors, to then attack the infrastructure of the state.

In the past, wars have broken out for much less than that.

Consequently I would like to give a couple of tips to the readers:

• Pope Francis is no better than the others and he is no different from the others. He is only a Jesuit, that is, a pathological liar trained to lie well, who was intended to improve the image of the Church after Razinger had thrown it away.
• When you see the word "Jesuit", always remember one thing: the way they are raised and trained, Jesuits lie even when they don't need to, they always lie in a way that sounds sincere, and especially they lie so that they can retract what they said. I am not saying that the Jesuit should not be believed: I am saying that one should not listen to him, because his words are toxic and his dialectic is designed to induce those who oppose it into a state of depression. They are dangerous to mental health and should be avoided.
• the church of Francesco, wherever it finds the side of the government, does the worst filth for which they are famous, from fomenting anti-Semitism to fomenting homophobia in its most violent forms, up to denying all rights to women. The image of Francis "pope different from the others" exists only in Italy due to an at least supine print (suffice it to read Scalfari's homilies).

The dialectic of the "communist pope", the "progressive pope" was created mainly to please the "center-left" and not to create a dichotomy "either center, or left", which would have radically changed the political landscape.

There is no good pope, there is no different pope, the church has remained what it has always been, only it has a pathological liar as its leader, and therefore it has managed to sell itself in this way.

But as soon as you go and touch on certain topics… obviously he shows his face.

There is nothing strange about this meddling, and they will never change.

The choice is yours: either you like anti-Semitism, homophobia, misogyny and fascism, or you are not Catholic. The choice is clear.

Oops, I forgot you are cowards.

And cowards do not like clear choices. It is not for nothing that the modern Catholic is, by definition, a "moderate", that is, mainly a coward.